Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932827AbXH3SMr (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:12:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932403AbXH3SMi (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:12:38 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-4-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:39640 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932157AbXH3SMg (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:12:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:12:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Jan Dittmer cc: Adrian Bunk , Michal Piotrowski , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , LKML , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions In-Reply-To: <46D66D49.20300@l4x.org> Message-ID: References: <46D5902C.1040905@googlemail.com> <46D5B544.4030708@l4x.org> <20070829234734.GA26410@stusta.de> <46D66D49.20300@l4x.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 807 Lines: 23 On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Jan Dittmer wrote: > Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should this > > > regression be fixed for 2.6.23? > > > > Looks like this is just alpha and a certain particular compiler version? > > binutils 2.15.95, gcc 3.3.6 and I could update to 4.0.4 or something > more recent I guess. And yes, it's only alpha. > > Of which file do you want the objdump? The one where the link fails. Dump the code around the unresolved symbol. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/