Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12272C27C76 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 19:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233439AbjA1TJB (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2023 14:09:01 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35054 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230012AbjA1TI6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2023 14:08:58 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B5B924C99; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:08:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1674932937; x=1706468937; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=jhxyAYLelEfckoe/PbY7Ef4L4nCPXQSheZkRYAjHAEs=; b=fBBiGRmQ9qgkac44fSToAJtLT194iO/nbI3GxgDf+7zmMcoDCqraGGuS Ps+fvfY1tgTso6dneYwUbVSXfCs11wMEXHxqUxojGFME5qK4gpDekredh Uq4xOg4UY9Xnwro7SJNk224eMgGub/w72hj+pklKuF4ckHJkGZD5egG2a Q234igauJ8tEd7izSSq+QFehmyApanOk0Z1F1Tl1Zzf2UhQ1aduh6827N 6xEPgkwY8LSo5ZNL0vFST39gAHn0lweU5R47/7x5DdcQX82o9cBvdZhs6 Ow5bAgGVTHQBbnMsKSK0jSUk+YsQ7K4xVGe+MVVlu36ucPBktKPQV/Lar A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10604"; a="354634200" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,254,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="354634200" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jan 2023 11:08:57 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10604"; a="613562517" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,254,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="613562517" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO ffa7f14d1d0f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jan 2023 11:08:48 -0800 Received: from kbuild by ffa7f14d1d0f with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pLqZD-00010e-11; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 19:08:47 +0000 Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 03:07:54 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Tejun Heo , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@kernel.org, joshdon@google.com, brho@google.com, pjt@google.com, derkling@google.com, haoluo@google.com, dvernet@meta.com, dschatzberg@meta.com, dskarlat@cs.cmu.edu, riel@surriel.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/30] sched_ext: Implement core-sched support Message-ID: <202301290223.0qWZoY9T-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230128001639.3510083-28-tj@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230128001639.3510083-28-tj@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tejun, I love your patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on linux/master] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.2-rc5] [cannot apply to tip/sched/core tj-cgroup/for-next next-20230127] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tejun-Heo/sched-Encapsulate-task-attribute-change-sequence-into-a-helper-macro/20230128-123001 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230128001639.3510083-28-tj%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH 27/30] sched_ext: Implement core-sched support config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230129/202301290223.0qWZoY9T-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/750f973dd349cc5c3df29319b0ffae740738a9d2 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Tejun-Heo/sched-Encapsulate-task-attribute-change-sequence-into-a-helper-macro/20230128-123001 git checkout 750f973dd349cc5c3df29319b0ffae740738a9d2 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 olddefconfig COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/ If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable | Reported-by: kernel test robot All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:58: >> kernel/sched/ext.c:3349:25: error: initialization of 'int (*)(const struct btf_type *, const struct btf_member *)' from incompatible pointer type 'int (*)(const struct btf_type *, const struct btf_member *, const struct bpf_prog *)' [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 3349 | .check_member = bpf_scx_check_member, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/sched/ext.c:3349:25: note: (near initialization for 'bpf_sched_ext_ops.check_member') kernel/sched/ext.c: In function 'scx_bpf_error_bstr': >> kernel/sched/ext.c:3906:16: error: variable 'bprintf_data' has initializer but incomplete type 3906 | struct bpf_bprintf_data bprintf_data = { .get_bin_args = true }; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> kernel/sched/ext.c:3906:51: error: 'struct bpf_bprintf_data' has no member named 'get_bin_args' 3906 | struct bpf_bprintf_data bprintf_data = { .get_bin_args = true }; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ >> kernel/sched/ext.c:3906:66: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 3906 | struct bpf_bprintf_data bprintf_data = { .get_bin_args = true }; | ^~~~ kernel/sched/ext.c:3906:66: note: (near initialization for 'bprintf_data') >> kernel/sched/ext.c:3906:33: error: storage size of 'bprintf_data' isn't known 3906 | struct bpf_bprintf_data bprintf_data = { .get_bin_args = true }; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ >> kernel/sched/ext.c:3927:71: warning: passing argument 4 of 'bpf_bprintf_prepare' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 3927 | ret = bpf_bprintf_prepare(fmt, UINT_MAX, bufs->data, data__sz / 8, | ~~~~~~~~~^~~ | | | u32 {aka unsigned int} In file included from include/linux/bpf_verifier.h:7, from kernel/sched/ext.c:3193: include/linux/bpf.h:2800:31: note: expected 'u32 **' {aka 'unsigned int **'} but argument is of type 'u32' {aka 'unsigned int'} 2800 | u32 **bin_buf, u32 num_args); | ~~~~~~^~~~~~~ >> kernel/sched/ext.c:3936:9: error: too many arguments to function 'bpf_bprintf_cleanup' 3936 | bpf_bprintf_cleanup(&bprintf_data); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:2801:6: note: declared here 2801 | void bpf_bprintf_cleanup(void); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/sched/ext.c:3906:33: warning: unused variable 'bprintf_data' [-Wunused-variable] 3906 | struct bpf_bprintf_data bprintf_data = { .get_bin_args = true }; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +3349 kernel/sched/ext.c 4c016c2bafb66b Tejun Heo 2023-01-27 3344 4c016c2bafb66b Tejun Heo 2023-01-27 3345 struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_sched_ext_ops = { 4c016c2bafb66b Tejun Heo 2023-01-27 3346 .verifier_ops = &bpf_scx_verifier_ops, 4c016c2bafb66b Tejun Heo 2023-01-27 3347 .reg = bpf_scx_reg, 4c016c2bafb66b Tejun Heo 2023-01-27 3348 .unreg = bpf_scx_unreg, 4c016c2bafb66b Tejun Heo 2023-01-27 @3349 .check_member = bpf_scx_check_member, 4c016c2bafb66b Tejun Heo 2023-01-27 3350 .init_member = bpf_scx_init_member, 4c016c2bafb66b Tejun Heo 2023-01-27 3351 .init = bpf_scx_init, 4c016c2bafb66b Tejun Heo 2023-01-27 3352 .name = "sched_ext_ops", 4c016c2bafb66b Tejun Heo 2023-01-27 3353 }; 4c016c2bafb66b Tejun Heo 2023-01-27 3354 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests