Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E22C54EED for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 01:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235184AbjA3BGx (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2023 20:06:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48794 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233396AbjA3BGv (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2023 20:06:51 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB3F711E8C; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 17:06:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.143]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4P4ql540C6z4f3kKc; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:06:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.73] (unknown [10.174.176.73]) by APP3 (Coremail) with SMTP id _Ch0CgDHcyEiGNdjTvytCQ--.44652S3; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:06:43 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] block, bfq: fix uaf for bfqq in bic_set_bfqq() To: Jens Axboe , Yu Kuai , jack@suse.cz, tj@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, paolo.valente@linaro.org, shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" References: <20230113094410.2907223-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> <4d3f6183-f9d4-b657-0205-fc240bc24c76@huaweicloud.com> <7ae20fa2-d9b4-9e21-4209-81bf4845a3c5@kernel.dk> From: Yu Kuai Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:06:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7ae20fa2-d9b4-9e21-4209-81bf4845a3c5@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: _Ch0CgDHcyEiGNdjTvytCQ--.44652S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7Xr4rtrW5GFy7Zr17uryUZFb_yoWfAFc_WF s0ka97Gw4jgr4ftFnFya1YyrWkKFyrX34rJry8tr1fAry7ZF4UCa1DWas3Aw45Wr9YkF93 AryqgFyYqr4rZjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUb3AFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG 6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8w A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j 6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oV Cq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0 I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r 4UM4x0Y48IcVAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kI c2xKxwCYjI0SjxkI62AI1cAE67vIY487MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4 AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE 17CEb7AF67AKxVWUtVW8ZwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMI IF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_WFyUJVCq 3wCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCT nIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfUoOJ5UUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, 在 2023/01/30 5:51, Jens Axboe 写道: > On 1/28/23 6:38 PM, Yu Kuai wrote: >> Hi, Jens >> >> 在 2023/01/13 17:44, Yu Kuai 写道: >>> After commit 64dc8c732f5c ("block, bfq: fix possible uaf for 'bfqq->bic'"), >>> bic->bfqq will be accessed in bic_set_bfqq(), however, in some context >>> bic->bfqq will be freed first, and bic_set_bfqq() is called with the freed >>> bic->bfqq. >>> >>> Fix the problem by always freeing bfqq after bic_set_bfqq(). >>> >> >> Sorry that I send this patch will wrong email, and you might missed this >> patch. >> >> Can you apply this patch? This patch can't be applied directly to lower >> version due to Paolo's patchset, I'll send lts patch seperately. > > I'm confused... So this patch only applies to the 6.3 branch, yet we > need it in 6.2 as far as I can tell. Why isn't it against block-6.2 > then? > Ok, I'll send a new patch against block-6.2. Thanks, Kuai