Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762866AbXH3WOz (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:14:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757787AbXH3WOo (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:14:44 -0400 Received: from [212.12.190.123] ([212.12.190.123]:33122 "EHLO raad.intranet" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755093AbXH3WOd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:14:33 -0400 From: Al Boldi To: "Natalie Protasevich" , "Stefan Richter" Subject: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:11:32 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: "Adrian Bunk" , "David Rees" , "Daniel Walker" , "Michal Piotrowski" , "Andrew Morton" , "=?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn?= Steinbrink" , eranian@hpl.hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <46CDE94A.7000600@googlemail.com> <46D6E135.8000203@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <32209efe0708300950r5787402l4d02cedd862314fd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <32209efe0708300950r5787402l4d02cedd862314fd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708310111.32132.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3466 Lines: 71 Natalie Protasevich wrote: > On 8/30/07, Stefan Richter wrote: > > Al Boldi wrote in "Designers and Builders (was: Who wants to maintain KR > > list for stable releases?)": > > | So, what's wrong with tapping into people's design suggestions, and > > | allowing others to implement it? > > > > Design suggestions should really come from people who also know a lot > > about the how-to. This is even true to some degree about feature > > requests. Besides, I've got a feeling that regardless of the field of > > ????? one works in, someone can only be a truly good designer if she or > > he has also been a builder. > > Sometimes you can feel that the suggestion comes from Unix veteran, or > one who does a lot of linux programming in user land. Their opinion is > often valuable. Exactly right. The important part in designing isn't the how-to but rather understanding the concepts involved. Once you have the concepts straight, implementation becomes a matter of which path to take. > > But back to the discussion. A tracker is not a good tool for > > brainstorming sessions, except perhaps for capturing conclusions after > > the brainstorm, as far as they are suitable as input for actual work. > > > > Also, "*allowing* others to implement it" has a strange ring to me. > > Where I am around, there are always far too few people who fix things > > and build things. But very, very occasionally there is someone new who > > wonders if there is an interesting TODO item which is perhaps in the > > reach of his abilities. Contributing a cleanup or an actual feature is > > typically much easier than fixing an open, tracked bug. (The bugs which > > end up in the bugtracker are usually the difficult ones.) The > > contributor learns something and, in a rare turn of events, may > > eventually become able and willing to join the bugfixing. > > Yes, indeed, one should really know the code in and out to do things > right. OTOH, not everyone has time to fix bugs in his department, or > it's just single person trying to handle all work. I suggest that in > this case our masters could first outline what needs to be done and > write it down in the bugzilla. This will 1) give a warm feeling to > reporter and everyone else that the problem is noticed and not taken > lightly and 2) give people with active and curious minds chance to try > solving a problem (my guess that would be many reporters themselves, > they often ask "what can I do and how can I fix this" and some more > junior developers looking for useful exercise and just need > directions.) At least some good debugging will come out of it, and no > harm... Agreed. But when I responded to this thread by changing the subject, because I felt it was somewhat OT to tracking, I meant to question the mentality of trying to nullify design suggestions for the mere reason of not submitting a prototype. Now, prototyping is a great way to refine your end-product, but it's a terrible waste of time in terms of articulating design-goals. IMHO, in the interest of keeping ahead of the competition, we should encourage people to express their design suggestions instead of discouraging them. Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/