Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA359C54EAA for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235950AbjA3JC4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 04:02:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44934 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235698AbjA3JCx (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 04:02:53 -0500 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 606D32718; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 01:02:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:02:45 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1675069369; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6fIFcywVaxJrMhVVv8btTwEym2El5BtVTKT/UKLhpU0=; b=BISmPm+DMZuR+8kXO3uyYDHZqeXB8sGpXJ2NlezzBDKiHydN4kOzqtn34It9avBNbehM3C /gWN0LdwoRb0h9NgeM5CMlYNlOZXpLiDS+6JdcJUgKoNUrmCzWLoFkX/scXd5N36g2+lvk 1nysNAZ6bPgoM1f9YUNNpXWCy0ZDeoicbqhbnqpmGnKYlIlTTk/EBDDnH9Gd8LtLZnun2q RrvAz2BRK7VorrhUsATZyA6d1ftN4uGPBVpIJzaLRp1ZLXucBDR/CgH27EXbMQxSy4Gw83 xaqjhfIGH3m2OvL94WWb3hl67oqFSnCk6GEi/Li68NZ1hdzr9BJd9iNqnXfUJQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1675069369; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6fIFcywVaxJrMhVVv8btTwEym2El5BtVTKT/UKLhpU0=; b=2NOyfTV5NunsOSBHrLICuz0jmkHrzR/OKkZnoLgO0zq9r4dQj2dyqzAaOfroNtJOn2Wh5b ooNaCchfHOWLq8CQ== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Oliver Sang Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, John Ogness Subject: Re: [rt-devel:linux-6.2.y-rt-rebase] [printk] 5342b8e20b: hwsim.ap_ft_eap_cui.fail Message-ID: References: <202301242146.213fe56e-oliver.sang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023-01-28 09:45:57 [+0800], Oliver Sang wrote: > hi Sebastian, Hi Oliver, > we rebuilt the kernel for both this commit and its parent, and make sure = the > config are same for both (as attached, actually also same to the config w= e used > in last tests for oiginal report), then rerun the tests more times, but t= he > issue seems still persistent >=20 > d144a18b3d136079 5342b8e20b15e5fb37e49de2435 > ---------------- --------------------------- > fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs > | | | > :20 100% 20:20 hwsim.ap_ft_eap_cui.fail > :20 100% 20:20 hwsim.ap_ft_many.fail > :20 100% 20:20 hwsim.ap_ft_pmf_bip_cmac_12= 8.fail >=20 > attached one dmesg for this commit and another for parent FYI. | wlan0: send auth to 02:00:00:00:03:00 (try 1/3) | +wlan0: send auth to 02:00:00:00:03:00 (try 2/3) | +wlan0: send auth to 02:00:00:00:03:00 (try 3/3) | wlan0: authenticated | wlan0: associate with 02:00:00:00:03:00 (try 1/3) | -wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 02:00:00:00:03:00 (capab=3D0x411 status=3D0 a= id=3D1) =E2=80=A6 | -wlan0: associated =E2=80=A6 | +wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 02:00:00:00:03:00 (capab=3D0x411 status=3D55 = aid=3D1) | +wlan0: 02:00:00:00:03:00 denied association (code=3D55) It is hard to comprehend that the printk change broke wifi/ hwsim. Let me add John to see what he thinks. > BTW, we noticed PREEMPT_RT is mentioned in commit message, but we didn't = enable > it in our config, not sure if this is relevant? These printk changes are kind of staged for upstream inclusion. "kind of" because John is reworking them. So either I broke something while rebasing them or the timing changed and this pops up. The 6.1 series had mostly the same printk code. This should work independent of PREEMPT_RT. Sebastian