MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230129064956.143664-1-tjytimi@163.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230129064956.143664-1-tjytimi@163.com>
From:   Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:55:55 +0530
Message-ID: <CAK9=C2VaxNezv+M=s=ZSA-YDf_17+hcom_z1=_j2YkRHg-yg7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] riscv: support arch_has_hw_pte_young()
To:     Jinyu Tang <tjytimi@163.com>
Cc:     palmer@rivosinc.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
        yuzhao@google.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com,
        ajones@ventanamicro.com, guoren@kernel.org, tongtiangen@huawei.com,
        anup@brainfault.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, falcon@tinylab.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:21 PM Jinyu Tang <tjytimi@163.com> wrote:
>
> The arch_has_hw_pte_young() is false for riscv by default. If it's
> false, page table walk is almost skipped for MGLRU reclaim. And it
> will also cause useless step in __wp_page_copy_user().
>
> RISC-V Privileged Book says that riscv have two schemes to manage A
> and D bit.
>
> So add a config for selecting, the default is true. For simple
> implementation riscv CPU which just generate page fault, unselect it.

I totally disagree with this approach.

Almost all existing RISC-V platforms don't have HW support
PTE.A and PTE.D updates.

We want the same kernel image to run HW with/without PTE.A
and PTE.D updates so kconfig based approach is not going to
fly.

>
> Signed-off-by: Jinyu Tang <tjytimi@163.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig               | 10 ++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h |  7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index e2b656043abf..17c82885549c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -180,6 +180,16 @@ config PAGE_OFFSET
>         default 0x80000000 if 64BIT && !MMU
>         default 0xff60000000000000 if 64BIT
>
> +config ARCH_HAS_HARDWARE_PTE_YOUNG
> +       bool "Hardware Set PTE Access Bit"
> +       default y
> +       help
> +         Select if hardware set A bit when PTE is accessed. The default is
> +         'Y', because most RISC-V CPU hardware can manage A and D bit.
> +         But RISC-V may have simple implementation that do not support
> +         hardware set A bit but only generate page fault, for that case just
> +         unselect it.
> +
>  config KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET
>         hex
>         depends on KASAN_GENERIC
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 4eba9a98d0e3..1db54ab4e1ba 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -532,6 +532,13 @@ static inline int ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>          */
>         return ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, address, ptep);
>  }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HARDWARE_PTE_YOUNG

> +#define arch_has_hw_pte_young arch_has_hw_pte_young
> +static inline bool arch_has_hw_pte_young(void)
> +{
> +       return true;

Drop the kconfig option ARCH_HAS_HARDWARE_PTE_YOUNG
and instead use code patching to return true only when Svadu
ISA extension is available in DT ISA string.


> +}
> +#endif
>
>  #define pgprot_noncached pgprot_noncached
>  static inline pgprot_t pgprot_noncached(pgprot_t _prot)
> --
> 2.30.2
>

Regards,
Anup