Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 05:59:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 05:59:29 -0500 Received: from slc154.modem.xmission.com ([166.70.9.154]:28938 "EHLO flinx.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 05:58:27 -0500 To: David Ford Cc: Andrew Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: neighbour table? In-Reply-To: <3A1779D9.409FB87B@linux.com> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 19 Nov 2000 00:45:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: David Ford's message of "Sat, 18 Nov 2000 22:57:29 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Ford writes: > Andrew Park wrote: > > > I get a message > > > > neighbour table overflow > > > > What does that mean? It seems that > > > > net/ipv4/route.c > > > > is the place where it prints this. But under what circumstances > > does this happen? > > Thanks > > It means you set the link state of eth0 up before lo. > > Be sure lo is established before eth0 and you won't see this message. Hmm. How does the interaction work. I've been meaning to track it for a while but haven't yet. >From the cases I have observed it seems to be connected with arp requests that aren't answered. (I.e when something is misconfigured and you try to nfsroot off of the wrong ip on your subnet) And I keep thinking neighbour table underflow would have been a better message. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/