Date:   Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:49:34 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
        jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/313] 6.1.9-rc1 review
Message-ID: <Y9gDLmmAwaKZX9yw@spud>
References: <20230130134336.532886729@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NR3ZMAgE4gQVTbRu"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230130134336.532886729@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk


--NR3ZMAgE4gQVTbRu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 02:47:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.9 release.
> There are 313 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>=20
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:42:39 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>=20
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.9-r=
c1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git=
 linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>=20
> thanks,
>=20
> greg k-h

Apart from the build issue that Guenter reported, things look fine on my
hardware.

> Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>     dt-bindings: riscv: fix single letter canonical order
>=20
> Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>     dt-bindings: riscv: fix underscore requirement for multi-letter exten=
sions

I think the email for these came in over the weekend but I was busy
unfortunately. Is dt-binding stuff like this usually backported?
I suppose there's no harm in making sure that it is correct...

Thanks,
Conor.

--NR3ZMAgE4gQVTbRu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCY9gDKwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0vsGAP40zBb1oywUvBje8ff/7Mx472MTK1QSNShqAvwCrFfpZgD/WUmUbmzAj7Fl
jqPRHtP7SYLDpH4UX/I8P8ShQTM50wU=
=6ICP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NR3ZMAgE4gQVTbRu--