Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FD9C54EAA for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 21:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231164AbjA3Vdi (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:33:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51724 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230035AbjA3Vde (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:33:34 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x130.google.com (mail-il1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D91C9743 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:33:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x130.google.com with SMTP id m15so1103840ilh.9 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:33:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6IuS+AlPvW98Qt+RMCpyKlCvmTcjIyk1rKVSn77FnZk=; b=yutfnYWYTGL9rvqX9NK8NKW0cYY1hX6qXFvfmsUjgbZzZlfTmeiQ+WZ1gCOYaVgPyi Pz/6HGBp3mi6cissYy/vIVKG5aVQsq/WyK6fieAf5449c9Urv+p074X4Ki6OVXo7jUyp aczEWVRjWJ1Jr9wtK6YtDx4v5S99KitRsYKMEldZWFZlIunlQhrJg0nMsHkIzgL19OW9 6elz4Lc07w6dTF8bGvvfTe9wvV5bokfctyQLf/ZK5Ve8ZnPVP5WVjlp1Hde8tpUd+A/O kIA/p4fvRiLydBA6uj5pnMYN6Udlh/N9Wq5FImMKIDtWt1uxA3m4v9b7Xggll/Krpes+ rzpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6IuS+AlPvW98Qt+RMCpyKlCvmTcjIyk1rKVSn77FnZk=; b=Wc9l2pdZR+mz5vTwWfmsUb+g60380mPcOovcckr9AmAECvW+Udp6Pbdlgy9JZmlJAV CScAkCP7d3Rx/m861sKVcjCA4gOZNS9X8owL7koNzqjnPueILhQvi5mseztYX7zu9+Ej kwNMnEl/I7+rjxQ/Pc2waD4b6OFn6C/nTe1f/K5I9q6cFy9cNGW/clfOc+ghJ/HmqXHR AhewK/4uyCYZB499RyVjcaAsAoZh66y0qp7x2pWwxbaVeh7AVO1wtvuLMoRwkmtX1P4z RmqUo9V7QIq6iLVRDxUEYLmH8qiiicUTIwtJ2Zj4McN14FFXNKm+esVuYHHf5Z3tGA/L H97Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kprIYLfj1zZwNI6iyrOOQY1WlusAAJ2cielsY1lQPKOle7R1rUu T7PegoJ/xZn1Xr4jsmCRWX6XTg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtNX89kIh+cJlv4D5se7EwlFyXWSnsI7waS+BCn54d+KKimODStx80DZ9GZTS40+VrkqquNvw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:6e11:0:b0:304:c683:3c8a with SMTP id j17-20020a926e11000000b00304c6833c8amr7247424ilc.3.1675114411605; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:33:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.94] ([96.43.243.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 10-20020a056e0211aa00b00310f9a0f8a7sm990514ilj.76.2023.01.30.13.33.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:33:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 14:33:29 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] iov_iter: Improve page extraction (pin or just list) Content-Language: en-US To: David Howells Cc: Al Viro , Christoph Hellwig , Matthew Wilcox , Jan Kara , David Hildenbrand , John Hubbard , Jason Gunthorpe , Logan Gunthorpe , Jeff Layton , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3351099.1675077249@warthog.procyon.org.uk> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <3351099.1675077249@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/30/23 4:14 AM, David Howells wrote: > Hi Jens, > > Could you consider pulling this patchset into the block tree? I think that > Al's fears wrt to pinned pages being removed from page tables causing deadlock > have been answered. Granted, there is still the issue of how to handle > vmsplice and a bunch of other places to fix, not least skbuff handling. > > I also have patches to fix cifs in a separate branch that I would also like to > push in this merge window - and that requires the first two patches from this > series also, so would it be possible for you to merge at least those two > rather than manually applying them? I've pulled this into a separate branch, but based on the block branch, for-6.3/iov-extract. It's added to for-next as well. -- Jens Axboe