Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92D7C636CC for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 10:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231478AbjAaKiG (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 05:38:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59106 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230390AbjAaKiD (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 05:38:03 -0500 Received: from mout-p-101.mailbox.org (mout-p-101.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:0:465::101]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 232F15588; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 02:38:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [10.196.197.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-101.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4P5hMk2chvz9sbx; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:37:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1675161474; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ccoXHsjUFcEconN3tjLNAPxuR8ELntH/GW6UVoGSst0=; b=eXcY7hjQ4atu6j4P2+0I1haVspuB9FCh+vtA369JcZvFqnnB2PDUpZh8luNdaGojHiAwl6 qVCs0cLZ030n8RGLsmXEA9ONROKWJYPwP7aujkOGeVagRRPfyGLEXuqRJkK6KAeSkjE0Ix FfpPY0+81ODk3/X4Esm7CGL9lW5zmG1BhthlXBY8KpviZE6eD0gWe6/EGvFGNJcYfKzBLo QsEyVpbHE+oWoXrYRSYB30dG0f5BlJMxdf7tXGJJL0ttErfKlTeXTtSOea1XoWbm0Feai8 +kY0WA9OK1Q6eMdittruIO88ZW0zzkqOZ3B7CW6NaM4zyvigxf6BOX8MvpzKaQ== Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:37:51 +0100 (CET) From: torvic9@mailbox.org To: Wyes Karny , Rafael J Wysocki , Huang Rui , Jonathan Corbet , Viresh Kumar , Mario.Limonciello@amd.com, Perry.Yuan@amd.com Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Bagas Sanjaya , santosh.shukla@amd.com, Len Brown , Robert Moore , Borislav Petkov , Ananth Narayan , gautham.shenoy@amd.com Message-ID: <1501106335.274.1675161471528@office.mailbox.org> In-Reply-To: <20230131052141.96475-1-wyes.karny@amd.com> References: <20230131052141.96475-1-wyes.karny@amd.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] amd_pstate: Add guided autonomous mode support MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MBO-RS-ID: 17a36ad1b76bcf2434f X-MBO-RS-META: fjapb9oida6usfhjqsyay73et9psnyzw Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Wyes Karny hat am 31.01.2023 05:21 GMT geschrieben: > > > From ACPI spec[1] below 3 modes for CPPC can be defined: > 1. Non autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies operating frequency/ > performance level through `Desired Performance` register and platform > follows that. > 2. Guided autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies min and max > frequencies/ performance levels through `Minimum Performance` and > `Maximum Performance` register, and platform can autonomously select an > operating frequency in this range. > 3. Fully autonomous: OS only hints (via EPP) to platform for the required > energy performance preference for the workload and platform autonomously > scales the frequency. > > Currently (1) is supported by amd_pstate as passive mode, and (3) is > implemented by EPP support[2]. This change is to support (2). > > In guided autonomous mode the min_perf is based on the input from the > scaling governor. For example, in case of schedutil this value depends > on the current utilization. And max_perf is set to max capacity. > > To activate guided auto mode ``amd_pstate=guided`` command line > parameter has to be passed in the kernel. > > Below are the results (normalized) of benchmarks with this patch: > System: Genoa 96C 192T > Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2 + EPP v11 + patch > Scaling governor: schedutil > > ================ dbench comparisons ================ > dbench result comparison: > Here results are throughput (MB/s) > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct) > 2 1.07 (0.00 pct) 1.06 (-0.93 pct) 1.07 (0.00 pct) > 4 1.68 (0.00 pct) 1.70 (1.19 pct) 1.72 (2.38 pct) > 8 2.61 (0.00 pct) 2.68 (2.68 pct) 2.76 (5.74 pct) > 16 4.16 (0.00 pct) 4.24 (1.92 pct) 4.53 (8.89 pct) > 32 5.98 (0.00 pct) 6.17 (3.17 pct) 7.30 (22.07 pct) > 64 8.67 (0.00 pct) 8.99 (3.69 pct) 10.71 (23.52 pct) > 128 11.98 (0.00 pct) 12.52 (4.50 pct) 14.67 (22.45 pct) > 256 15.73 (0.00 pct) 16.13 (2.54 pct) 17.81 (13.22 pct) > 512 15.77 (0.00 pct) 16.32 (3.48 pct) 16.39 (3.93 pct) > dbench power comparison: > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (4.00 pct) > 2 0.99 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-2.02 pct) 1.02 (3.03 pct) > 4 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.98 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct) > 8 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (1.02 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct) > 16 0.99 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (1.01 pct) 1.04 (5.05 pct) > 32 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.07 (4.90 pct) > 64 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.11 (5.71 pct) > 128 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.15 (6.48 pct) > 256 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (7.14 pct) > 512 1.18 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (-0.84 pct) 1.26 (6.77 pct) > > ================ git-source comparisons ================ > git-source result comparison: > Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec) > Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.93 (-7.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) > git-source power comparison: > Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.96 (-4.00 pct) > > ================ kernbench comparisons ================ > kernbench result comparison: > Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec) > Load: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct) > 48 1.26 (0.00 pct) 1.28 (1.58 pct) 1.25 (-0.79 pct) > 64 1.39 (0.00 pct) 1.47 (5.75 pct) 1.43 (2.87 pct) > 96 1.48 (0.00 pct) 1.50 (1.35 pct) 1.49 (0.67 pct) > 128 1.29 (0.00 pct) 1.32 (2.32 pct) 1.33 (3.10 pct) > 192 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) 1.21 (3.41 pct) > 256 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.18 (0.85 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) > 384 1.16 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (0.86 pct) 1.21 (4.31 pct) > kernbench power comparison: > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) > 48 0.87 (0.00 pct) 0.81 (-6.89 pct) 0.88 (1.14 pct) > 64 0.81 (0.00 pct) 0.73 (-9.87 pct) 0.77 (-4.93 pct) > 96 0.75 (0.00 pct) 0.74 (-1.33 pct) 0.75 (0.00 pct) > 128 0.83 (0.00 pct) 0.79 (-4.81 pct) 0.83 (0.00 pct) > 192 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) > 256 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) > 384 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) > > ================ tbench comparisons ================ > tbench result comparison: > Here results are throughput (MB/s) > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.70 (-30.00 pct) 1.37 (37.00 pct) > 2 2.64 (0.00 pct) 1.39 (-47.34 pct) 2.70 (2.27 pct) > 4 4.89 (0.00 pct) 2.75 (-43.76 pct) 5.28 (7.97 pct) > 8 9.46 (0.00 pct) 5.42 (-42.70 pct) 10.22 (8.03 pct) > 16 19.05 (0.00 pct) 10.42 (-45.30 pct) 19.94 (4.67 pct) > 32 37.50 (0.00 pct) 20.23 (-46.05 pct) 36.87 (-1.68 pct) > 64 61.24 (0.00 pct) 43.08 (-29.65 pct) 62.96 (2.80 pct) > 128 67.16 (0.00 pct) 69.08 (2.85 pct) 67.34 (0.26 pct) > 256 154.59 (0.00 pct) 162.33 (5.00 pct) 156.78 (1.41 pct) > 512 154.02 (0.00 pct) 156.74 (1.76 pct) 153.48 (-0.35 pct) > tbench power comparison: > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.08 (8.00 pct) > 2 1.04 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-6.73 pct) 1.11 (6.73 pct) > 4 1.12 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (-11.60 pct) 1.18 (5.35 pct) > 8 1.25 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (-16.80 pct) 1.31 (4.80 pct) > 16 1.53 (0.00 pct) 1.13 (-26.14 pct) 1.58 (3.26 pct) > 32 2.01 (0.00 pct) 1.36 (-32.33 pct) 2.03 (0.99 pct) > 64 2.58 (0.00 pct) 2.14 (-17.05 pct) 2.61 (1.16 pct) > 128 2.80 (0.00 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) > 256 3.39 (0.00 pct) 3.43 (1.17 pct) 3.42 (0.88 pct) > 512 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) > > Note: this series is based on top of EPP v11 [3] series Hi Wyes, Can you rebase this patchset onto the newest EPP v12 series [1] ? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20230131090016.3970625-1-perry.yuan@amd.com/ Cheers, Tor Vic > > Change log: > > v3 -> v4: > - Fixed active mode low frequency issue reported by Peter Jung and Tor Vic > - Documentation modification suggested by Bagas Sanjaya > > v2 -> v3: > - Addressed review comments form Mario. > - Picked up RB tag from Mario. > - Rebase on top of EPP v11 [3]. > > v1 -> v2: > - Fix issue with shared mem systems. > - Rebase on top of EPP series. > > [1]: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221110175847.3098728-1-Perry.Yuan@amd.com/ > [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20230118075210.447418-1-perry.yuan@amd.com/ > > Wyes Karny (6): > acpi: cppc: Add min and max perf reg writing support > acpi: cppc: Add auto select register read/write support > cpufreq: amd_pstate: Add guided autonomous mode > Documentation: amd_pstate: Move amd_pstate param to alphabetical order > cpufreq: amd_pstate: Add guided mode control support via sysfs > Documentation: amd_pstate: Update amd_pstate status sysfs for guided > > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 41 ++-- > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 31 ++- > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 121 +++++++++++- > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 184 +++++++++++++----- > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 11 ++ > include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 2 + > 6 files changed, 309 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.34.1