From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] arm64/mm: Intercept pfn changes in set_pte_at()
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 16:28:38 +0000
Message-Id: <167518251203.582976.5407379627860091879.b4-ty@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230130121457.1607675-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
References: <20230130121457.1607675-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:44:57 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Changing pfn on a user page table mapped entry, without first going through
> break-before-make (BBM) procedure is unsafe. This just updates set_pte_at()
> to intercept such changes, via an updated pgattr_change_is_safe(). This new
> check happens via __check_racy_pte_update(), which has now been renamed as
> __check_safe_pte_update().
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!

[1/1] arm64/mm: Intercept pfn changes in set_pte_at()
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/004fc58f917c

-- 
Catalin