Message-ID: <a3fdb1a7-0585-6282-0b84-27c82a35244b@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:32:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,dp-video-phy: deprecate
 syscon phandle
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
        replicant@osuosl.org, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_J=c3=bccker?= <martin.juecker@gmail.com>,
        Henrik Grimler <henrik@grimler.se>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
References: <20230127194057.186458-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <20230127194057.186458-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230127194057.186458-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 27/01/2023 20:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The DisplayPort phy is actually part of the Power Management Unit system
> controller, thus it should be its child, instead of sibling node with
> syscon phandle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,dp-video-phy.yaml        | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Hi Vinod,

It turns out, my previous patch (1/8, which I took via Samsung SoC)
actually depends on these here. Without these here it causes warning.
That 1/8 patch is already in soc tree and will be for v6.3. Will you be
taking these for v6.3? If not, could you Ack and I will take them.

Best regards,
Krzysztof