Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 06:44:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 06:44:05 -0500 Received: from mail0.epfl.ch ([128.178.50.57]:46860 "HELO mail0.epfl.ch") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 06:43:55 -0500 Message-ID: <3C149FF9.407@epfl.ch> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:43:53 +0100 From: Nicolas Aspert Organization: LTS-DE-EPFL User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcelo Tosatti , Alan Cox CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patches in 2.4.17-pre2 that aren't in 2.5.1-pre8 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello all > > In many cases that isnt true, and for a lot of the pending patches its > pointless merging them into 2.5 until 2.5 gets into better shape. Going back > over them as you have done is something that does need doing, but not until > the block layer has some semblance of completion about it Well I just saw the opposite ;-) ... A patch I had submitted a few weeks ago for Intel 830MP agp support has been intgrated in 2.5.1-pre3, but is still not in the 2.4 branch... Several users have reported success with this patch, so unless somebody shows storng opposition, I would suggest to merge it... Get it here : http://ltswww.epfl.ch/~aspert/patches/patch-agp_i830mp-2.4.16 Best regards -- Nicolas Aspert Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS) Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/