Message-ID: <15f7dcbcdaf6fdb05bfc1d5bee1bb2e1bf3c43fc.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: ep93xx: split device in multiple
From:   Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
To:     Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Wed, 01 Feb 2023 10:18:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20230201091021.7090-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
References: <CAMRc=MciMOfCo_fS_Um0xaQT2H=QSRgEUA5iTwxmpXqo2k2NJg@mail.gmail.com>
         <20230201091021.7090-1-nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

Hello Nikita,

On Wed, 2023-02-01 at 12:10 +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> This prepares ep93xx SOC gpio to convert into device tree driver:
> - dropped banks and legacy defines
> - split AB IRQ and make it shared
>=20
> We are relying on IRQ number information A, B ports have single shared
> IRQ, while F port have dedicated IRQ for each line.
>=20
> Also we had to split single ep93xx platform_device into multiple, one
> for each port, without this we can't do a full working transition from
> legacy platform code into device tree capable. All GPIO_LOOKUP were
> change to match new chip namings.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
> Bart, i've rebased on the top of gpio/for-next (there were issues
> indeed), but this patch still won't apply. That's becouse it's dependant=
=20
> on Linus patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230111132210.134478-1-linus.wa=
lleij@linaro.org/T/
>=20
> Alexander can we have Linus patch somehow applied to ep93xx ?=20

in contrast to me Linus and Bartosz do maintain their GPIO tree,
from my side I've performed a quick test, so it's OK from my PoV to apply,
but I cannot really assist here more.

--=20
Alexander Sverdlin.