Date:   Wed, 1 Feb 2023 22:58:08 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] perf: Add more syscalls to benchmark
Message-ID: <Y9sYsC3bKPGop+U2@kernel.org>
References: <1668052208-14047-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
 <c71e9666-c62a-83ae-0d7b-580dc717e9f1@loongson.cn>
 <dbf82707-df17-466b-f882-aa4e25d4f629@loongson.cn>
 <CAM9d7cgH0zK-DUmUV7yw1BJBvgyxWys9zPuB5Q7dQQwta=XcGA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cgH0zK-DUmUV7yw1BJBvgyxWys9zPuB5Q7dQQwta=XcGA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

Em Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 01:04:42PM -0800, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 5:23 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/03/2022 05:19 PM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/10/2022 11:50 AM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> > >> Tested on x86_64, arm64, mips64 and loongarch64.
> > >>
> > >> Tiezhu Yang (4):
> > >>   tools x86: Keep list sorted by number in unistd_{32,64}.h
> > >>   perf bench syscall: Introduce bench_syscall_common()
> > >>   perf bench syscall: Add getpgid syscall benchmark
> > >>   perf bench syscall: Add execve syscall benchmark
> > >>
> > >>  tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h | 23 ++++++---
> > >>  tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h | 23 ++++++---
> > >>  tools/perf/bench/bench.h                    |  2 +
> > >>  tools/perf/bench/syscall.c                  | 76
> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >>  tools/perf/builtin-bench.c                  |  2 +
> > >>  5 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >
> > > Ping, any more comments?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Tiezhu
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > If this patch series has no value and is not acceptable,
> > or what should I do to update, please let me know.
> 
> I'm so sorry about being late a lot.
> I don't have any objection to this series.
> 
> For the execve bench, I think it's actually fork + execve
> then maybe it makes sense to have a fork only bench
> to compare the execve part precisely.
> 
> But it can be added later, so
> 
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

Applied.

- Arnaldo