Message-ID: <4b847318-280f-8b9b-bafa-2ada86a54cfa@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:38:19 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.6.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: KVM: Replace optarg with arg in
 guest_modes_cmdline
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Cc:     kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20230201054522.162611-1-shahuang@redhat.com>
 <CAHVum0eH_XrrPiviYYWEu=FouhEXeWq1mcx0=BoiF8NaoyVj_g@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHVum0eH_XrrPiviYYWEu=FouhEXeWq1mcx0=BoiF8NaoyVj_g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 2/2/23 00:00, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 9:46 PM <shahuang@redhat.com> wrote:
>> From: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
>>
>> The parameter arg in guest_modes_cmdline not being used now, and the
>> optarg should be replaced with arg in guest_modes_cmdline.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/guest_modes.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/guest_modes.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/guest_modes.c
>> index 99a575bbbc52..1f2dca4520ab 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/guest_modes.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/guest_modes.c
>> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ void guest_modes_cmdline(const char *arg)
>>                  mode_selected = true;
>>          }
>>
>> -       mode = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 10);
>> +       mode = strtoul(arg, NULL, 10);
> While you are at it, can you also change strtoul to atoi_non_negative()?
>
> An underflow negative number will print an error message with a wrong
> positive guest mode ID not passed by the user.

Of course I can do that. Thanks for you Suggestion.

Thanks,

Shaoqin

>>          TEST_ASSERT(mode < NUM_VM_MODES, "Guest mode ID %d too big", mode);
>>          guest_modes[mode].enabled = true;
>>   }
>> --
>> 2.39.0
>>