MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1675254998-4951-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
In-Reply-To: <1675254998-4951-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Feb 2023 03:26:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKWWf6==B=X+2zazt1dmfK6ENAaGWWS_2QkX4bDJrJJNg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: Replace BPF_ALU and BPF_JMP with
 BPF_ALU32 and BPF_JMP64
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:36 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote:
>
> The intention of this patchset is to make the code more readable,
> no functional changes, based on bpf-next.
>
> If this patchset makes no sense, please ignore it and sorry for that.
...
>  157 files changed, 4299 insertions(+), 4295 deletions(-)

Are you trying to get to the top of lwn's "most active developers by
lines changed" ?
I'm sure you knew that it's most likely going to be rejected,
yet you still sent it. why?
Your developer's reputation suffers.
Think quality and not quantity.