Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: Replace BPF_ALU and BPF_JMP with
 BPF_ALU32 and BPF_JMP64
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
References: <1675254998-4951-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
 <CAADnVQKWWf6==B=X+2zazt1dmfK6ENAaGWWS_2QkX4bDJrJJNg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From:   Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Message-ID: <ba068c07-1337-3efc-ce4d-045d77dffd50@loongson.cn>
Date:   Thu, 2 Feb 2023 20:55:47 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux mips64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQKWWf6==B=X+2zazt1dmfK6ENAaGWWS_2QkX4bDJrJJNg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 02/02/2023 07:26 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:36 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> The intention of this patchset is to make the code more readable,
>> no functional changes, based on bpf-next.
>>
>> If this patchset makes no sense, please ignore it and sorry for that.
> ...
>>  157 files changed, 4299 insertions(+), 4295 deletions(-)
>
> Are you trying to get to the top of lwn's "most active developers by
> lines changed" ?

Oh, no, no intention of doing so.

> I'm sure you knew that it's most likely going to be rejected,
> yet you still sent it. why?

Sorry for the trouble.
Maybe just send patch #1 and #4 as RFC is a proper way.

> Your developer's reputation suffers.
> Think quality and not quantity.
>

Anyway, thank you for your reply.