Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8DEC61DA4 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232409AbjBBSYC (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2023 13:24:02 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57884 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231695AbjBBSX7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2023 13:23:59 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC50C65F02; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:23:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4P76XB6ZHdz67bmq; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 02:20:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from P_UKIT01-A7bmah.china.huawei.com (10.48.151.167) by lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.34; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:23:55 +0000 From: To: , CC: , , , , , , , Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/1] rasdaemon: Fix poll() on per_cpu trace_pipe_raw do not retun Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:23:51 +0000 Message-ID: <20230202182352.792-1-shiju.jose@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0.windows.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.48.151.167] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100006.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.224) To lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Shiju Jose The error events are not received in the rasdaemon since kernel 6.1-rc6. This issue is firstly detected and reported, when testing the CXL error events in the rasdaemon. Debugging showed, poll() on trace_pipe_raw in the ras-events.c do not return. and this issue is seen after the commit 42fb0a1e84ff525ebe560e2baf9451ab69127e2b ("tracing/ring-buffer: Have polling block on watermark"). This also verified using the test application for poll() and select() on trace_pipe_raw. There is also a bug reported on this issue, https://lore.kernel.org/all/31eb3b12-3350-90a4-a0d9-d1494db7cf74@oracle.com/ This issue occurs for the per_cpu case, when calling the ring_buffer_poll_wait(), in kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c, with the buffer_percent > 0 and then wait until the percentage of pages are available. The default value set for the buffer_percent is 50 in the kernel/trace/trace.c. As a fix, rasdaemon set buffer_percent = 0 through the /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/instances/rasdaemon/buffer_percent, then the task will wake up as soon as data is added to any of the specific cpu buffer and poll() on per_cpu/cpuX/trace_pipe_raw does not block indefinitely. Depends on kernel patch tracing: Fix poll() and select() do not work on per_cpu trace_pipe and trace_pipe_raw Signed-off-by: Shiju Jose --- ras-events.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) diff --git a/ras-events.c b/ras-events.c index 3691311..72225a9 100644 --- a/ras-events.c +++ b/ras-events.c @@ -383,6 +383,8 @@ static int read_ras_event_all_cpus(struct pthread_data *pdata, int warnonce[n_cpus]; char pipe_raw[PATH_MAX]; int legacy_kernel = 0; + int fd; + char buf[2]; #if 0 int need_sleep = 0; #endif @@ -402,6 +404,33 @@ static int read_ras_event_all_cpus(struct pthread_data *pdata, return -ENOMEM; } + /* Fix for poll() do not return on per_cpu trace_pipe and + * trace_pipe_raw with the default buffer_percent in the kernel trace, + * introduced by the following change in the kernel + * https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221020231427.41be3f26@gandalf.local.home/T/#u. + * Set buffer_percent to 0 so that poll() returned immediately + * when the trace data is available in the ras per_cpu trace pipe_raw */ + fd = open_trace(pdata[0].ras, "buffer_percent", O_RDWR); + if (fd < 0) { + log(TERM, LOG_ERR, "Can't open trace buffer_percent\n"); + return -1; + } + size = write(fd, "0", 1); + if (size <= 0) { + log(TERM, LOG_ERR, "Can't set rasdaemon trace buffer_percent\n"); + return -1; + } + size = read(fd, buf, 1); + if (size <= 0) { + log(TERM, LOG_ERR, "Can't read rasdaemon trace buffer_percent\n"); + return -1; + } + if (atoi(buf) != 0) { + log(TERM, LOG_ERR, "Can't verify rasdaemon trace buffer_percent\n"); + return -1; + } + close(fd); + for (i = 0; i < (n_cpus + 1); i++) fds[i].fd = -1; -- 2.25.1