Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:48:45 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@android.com, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpuset: Fix cpuset_cpus_allowed() to not filter
 offline CPUs
Message-ID: <Y9whrU4IUeleqdrt@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <20230131221719.3176-1-will@kernel.org>
 <20230131221719.3176-2-will@kernel.org>
 <6b068916-5e1b-a943-1aad-554964d8b746@redhat.com>
 <Y9t1sP/6nFht7RSN@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <d630ca53-71f0-c735-fbc3-e826479aa86b@redhat.com>
 <Y9wSC1Wxlm8CKKlN@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <2bc730db-704d-080b-6869-02f6d0035fad@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2bc730db-704d-080b-6869-02f6d0035fad@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 03:46:02PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> > > I will work on a patchset to do that as a counter offer.
> > We will need a small and simple patch for /urgent, or I will need to
> > revert all your patches -- your call.
> > 
> > I also don't tihnk you fully appreciate the ramifications of
> > task_cpu_possible_mask(), cpuset currently gets that quite wrong.
> 
> OK, I don't realize the urgency of that. If it is that urgent, I will have
> no objection to get it in for now. We can improve it later on. So are you
> planning to get it into the current 6.2 rc or 6.3?
> 
> Tejun, are you OK with that as you are the cgroup maintainer?

Yeah, gotta fix the regression but is there currently a solution which fixes
the regression but doesn't further break other stuff?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun