Date:   Thu, 2 Feb 2023 21:43:14 +0000
From:   Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To:     Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
        kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Fix CPU resume/on with pKVM
Message-ID: <Y9wucriA2S/mN1pq@google.com>
References: <20230201103755.1398086-1-qperret@google.com>
 <86bkmd1ly4.wl-maz@kernel.org>
 <Y9qZ5XoXW1XQ70eE@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y9qZ5XoXW1XQ70eE@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 04:57:09PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 Feb 2023 at 14:48:03 (+0000), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > How do you want to deal with the backports? None of the patches have a
> > Cc: stable, and only the last one has a Fixes: tag, but cannot be
> > applied standalone.
> 
> Right, I wasn't sure what was best -- the first patches aren't really
> fixing anything per se but yeah, we kinda need them...
> 
> Happy to re-post a version with the same 'Fixes:' tag on all patches and
> 'Cc: stable' everywhere if that makes things easier. Wdyt?

I'd like to get these patches cooking in -next so I'll probably just
take what you've posted.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver