Date:   Thu,  2 Feb 2023 22:34:08 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20230202223409.2812443-1-jstultz@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20230202223409.2812443-1-jstultz@google.com>
Message-ID: <20230202223409.2812443-3-jstultz@google.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] locktorture: Add nested locking to rtmutex torture tests
From:   John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

This patch adds randomized nested locking to the mutex torture
tests.

This was inspired by locktorture extensions originally implemented
by Connor O'Brien, for stress testing the proxy-execution series:
  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221003214501.2050087-12-connoro@google.com/

Comments or feedback would be greatly appreciated!

Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
 kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index 27d92ce36836..5fb17a5057b5 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -506,6 +506,28 @@ static struct lock_torture_ops ww_mutex_lock_ops = {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
 static DEFINE_RT_MUTEX(torture_rtmutex);
+static struct rt_mutex torture_nested_rtmutexes[MAX_LOCKS];
+static struct lock_class_key nested_rtmutex_keys[MAX_LOCKS];
+
+static void torture_rtmutex_init(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LOCKS; i++)
+		__rt_mutex_init(&torture_nested_rtmutexes[i], __func__,
+				&nested_rtmutex_keys[i]);
+}
+
+static int torture_rtmutex_nested_lock(int tid __maybe_unused,
+				       u32 lockset)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nlocks; i++)
+		if (lockset & (1 << i))
+			rt_mutex_lock(&torture_nested_rtmutexes[i]);
+	return 0;
+}
 
 static int torture_rtmutex_lock(int tid __maybe_unused)
 __acquires(torture_rtmutex)
@@ -570,11 +592,24 @@ __releases(torture_rtmutex)
 	rt_mutex_unlock(&torture_rtmutex);
 }
 
+static void torture_rtmutex_nested_unlock(int tid __maybe_unused,
+					  u32 lockset)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = nlocks - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+		if (lockset & (1 << i))
+			rt_mutex_unlock(&torture_nested_rtmutexes[i]);
+}
+
 static struct lock_torture_ops rtmutex_lock_ops = {
+	.init		= torture_rtmutex_init,
+	.nested_lock	= torture_rtmutex_nested_lock,
 	.writelock	= torture_rtmutex_lock,
 	.write_delay	= torture_rtmutex_delay,
 	.task_boost     = torture_rtmutex_boost,
 	.writeunlock	= torture_rtmutex_unlock,
+	.nested_unlock	= torture_rtmutex_nested_unlock,
 	.readlock       = NULL,
 	.read_delay     = NULL,
 	.readunlock     = NULL,
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog