Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 15:22:03 +0100
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To:     Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Cc:     pratyush@kernel.org, michael@walle.cc, richard@nod.at,
        broonie@kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: s/a SPI/an SPI
Message-ID: <20230203152203.55f584a9@xps-13>
In-Reply-To: <dac961df-c43a-03a1-2d85-33075f75589b@linaro.org>
References: <20230203080136.68505-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
        <dac961df-c43a-03a1-2d85-33075f75589b@linaro.org>
Organization: Bootlin
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Hi Tudor,

tudor.ambarus@linaro.org wrote on Fri, 3 Feb 2023 12:18:25 +0200:

> Sent a tree wide patch instead, feel free to comment at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230203101624.474611-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.=
org/T/#u

I'm wondering how relevant this change is, because I ear a lot of
people (including me) saying both:
- "an ess P. I. controller"
and
- "a [spi] controller"

Anyway, I won't oppose either.

Thanks,
Miqu=C3=A8l