Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933460AbXIBAjR (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 20:39:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932623AbXIBAjB (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 20:39:01 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:58747 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932572AbXIBAjA (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 20:39:00 -0400 X-Authenticated: #5039886 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19F9vEP6XVF2owot3Ix2nk+0Mb2Sg7ho1xjR1h+1A lecpT/ngJd864n Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 02:39:36 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Steinbrink To: Oleg Verych Cc: Willy Tarreau , Matti Aarnio , David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] good job guys with the anti-spam ! Message-ID: <20070902003936.GA8005@atjola.homenet> References: <20070731214011.GA17735@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1729 Lines: 46 On 2007.09.02 02:36:18 +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > * Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:40:11 +0200 > > > [] > > eventhough people often write only when they have something to complain > > about, I for once would like to congratulate Matti and David, our mail > > admins, for the wonderful job they've done with the spams lately. This > > month, I might have seen maybe one or two instead of perhaps 30 per day > > earlier. While it did not bother me that much earlier, I can say that > > the list is more pleasant to read every day, and I think that's great. > > > > Kudos guys ! > > > > Willy > > > > PS: please do not start another one of those long useless threads from now on > > > > Instead let me share an idea and see what will happen (if any). > The mailing list policy: > > 1. sent mails must have in-reply-to (rfc2821 SHOULD) with valid, i.e. > existing in archives, message-id; > > 2. otherwise sender gets response about creating new thread. Replying > to that message will enable (1). Ehrm, you want everyone who wants to start a new thread to: - send an email - await response from the mail server - send the same email again as a reply to the first one Did I get that right? If so, good luck running from anyone who doesn't send his patch series as a bunch of replies to a 00/XX message. Although it would likely be fun to see the next guy that sends a 600 emails patch bomb getting buried alive in "Please confirm that you want to create a new thread" emails. Bj?rn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/