Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DD9C636D6 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 16:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233048AbjBCQFN (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2023 11:05:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36580 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233297AbjBCQFG (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2023 11:05:06 -0500 Received: from mail-yw1-f181.google.com (mail-yw1-f181.google.com [209.85.128.181]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F866A2A4C; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 08:05:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw1-f181.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-51ba4b1b9feso73909487b3.11; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 08:05:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=7wIYdPVdo9w8wJeFawgcWpGlCHgpXqP0aU2proD/z4A=; b=h7Y+KCF7rYYuzKa23/XVH7EqKMk5LTZnVw2PqeMnOFM+xWLo9NJHdhJ7VXQEzh/jEQ 43USwhMjApuBXpP8uDT4/9ZWtcfiac4as5JkOYvgtFByz33C36/DfwkQOIfY4SCuqGDK Hv9r2B8MXFnnKurrI2YIIpkW+iLxoK+7IxwMN41GkLxe5SYkAMuhmyEdUiIf3h+NbtlV Vjrsgdy/0uWZlA6GCyhPVQQLTybtIXlZAYgovWjXFPEmbkXmJ1R6oNLeW1Q9wjp7INOt dpYwOYdzkRdvH3M1sRrIE5bOaaFyPkuU4ojNBjyPoq103GnN5D0iyOl6ib+Yx3KeeBsY CkPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUt0cK5Wr875sm9z9U0bJzP+91+5+O4ghRPfaBfRmU8ORcDIFi3 96J/1/Ux8eteagW4UXGq2OK0nBZCNN5sEw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/a/Eq2gP6R7fciPiamzKQR29gjZ+vbzZcYT0ptMjiTbNLQIWRvobf0piyfY0iq11BERjizRw== X-Received: by 2002:a0d:d648:0:b0:506:4342:1a2d with SMTP id y69-20020a0dd648000000b0050643421a2dmr7042060ywd.12.1675440302426; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 08:05:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yb1-f179.google.com (mail-yb1-f179.google.com. [209.85.219.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r195-20020a37a8cc000000b0071ddbe8fe23sm2101905qke.24.2023.02.03.08.05.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Feb 2023 08:05:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-f179.google.com with SMTP id 74so6528236ybl.12; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 08:05:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a5b:941:0:b0:865:e214:f4e3 with SMTP id x1-20020a5b0941000000b00865e214f4e3mr352487ybq.604.1675440301482; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 08:05:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230113062339.1909087-1-hch@lst.de> <11e2e0a8-eabe-2d8c-d612-9cdd4bcc3648@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20230116071306.GA15848@lst.de> <40dc1bc1-d9cd-d9be-188e-5167ebae235c@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20230203071423.GA24833@lst.de> <20230203083037.GA30738@lst.de> In-Reply-To: From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 17:04:49 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: remove arch/sh To: Randy Dunlap Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Christoph Hellwig , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Laurent Pinchart , Kieran Bingham , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Randy, On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 4:57 PM Randy Dunlap wrote: > Is this "sh64" still accurate and applicable? from Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst: > > But some architectures such as x86 and sparc have aliases. > > - x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit > - sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > - sparc: sparc32 for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit No, support for sh64 was removed in commit 37744feebc086908 ("sh: remove sh5 support") in v5.8. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds