Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD18C636D4 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 17:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233741AbjBCRU6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2023 12:20:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34168 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232448AbjBCRUz (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2023 12:20:55 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E29D18B17; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 09:20:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id k91-20020a9d19e4000000b0068bca1294aaso1550530otk.8; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 09:20:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=uBFW9j1K4ay/fyk8RRmaUzvcSTxtx0DjoFk98LpIzlE=; b=XzM5UMtU8zsLoV581At1cESCgD8+GnpzJIp0HACv5i81ScqYJts1PlErkyE7gqq2u8 J0NmRUAVlw5TwxEbdG3JD5Vaz1ZLGUn542R79WI3IrTkeLYxNWUxMDxP7xJiFPRs404J a9fXZw8GDYe7/ARsERbsujmQmJ62+Sjt85oJFyOkd5bGEo7sCAQNK8PrfcIMv1XTNy8r EmXzjtGwjV2eIXiIjk2WQG7KyHsvblM3XP91hG8f8wHvnc7ta1zhzusI7Eq3uXztko6V Mb9pRcKIdrKx0TefqEX7qvYp/JUWPYPhZRr1VfgPnFqgumTSRWjkoVKWhD3Gqmzg/dhq wkdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uBFW9j1K4ay/fyk8RRmaUzvcSTxtx0DjoFk98LpIzlE=; b=xqBHj40oucqIr/cBWif9qFjVOfAVJtTpUQEsYjn5cVY3A9HzI9MvVl2FUTn2/VEe/9 xkRiEbkARiGE5CNQezF9yFZ2EAnqO4hToaRkXmWR4CbpWHvJhdnIJCWMY5RZP/2o60oE VOUqxcUmOL7+YL6Xi3OucbAZtt5cdAqbIh0LOI5AuFrODLoj3FAUmbPBQmUMVQw0AsIM q1KEEW2gEZlGGVHCxgPUWdnq+fiQ83EksnSy5hDXsN44N4yGLaC0vBUM2sfjKsecoo8C CRGHLlvFaY9aOUdC2uYowg44ophYH8Q4221xHd2wGvxl1/SIqw8f2kTbCGTmhnXBXzwu jcHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVxL+qV+jg/e5Ei8168oammebBKZQHaF/x48qZTIRj1fKB1PKJ3 p40FgKU10KVaXMBJENtRkuk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9AidXA4NehQTMKgjQrvwNVW3BN71g3Gde98+Im1ser4mqZiya9kyMtAVXwq04zVvTkZDAD/A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:26f0:b0:688:4670:e964 with SMTP id m48-20020a05683026f000b006884670e964mr5870691otu.27.1675444853908; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 09:20:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k5-20020a9d7dc5000000b0068bcb44e7f5sm1297480otn.68.2023.02.03.09.20.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Feb 2023 09:20:53 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 09:20:52 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/79] 4.19.272-rc2 review Message-ID: <20230203172052.GC1500930@roeck-us.net> References: <20230203170324.096985239@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230203170324.096985239@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 06:04:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.272 release. > There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Feb 2023 17:03:03 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Ah, I was too late. The ia64 problem reported against the 5.4.y release candidate is seen in here and against v4.14.y as well. Guenter