Message-ID: <526a7ea9-f209-16ed-732b-6c105582c18a@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 09:57:34 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSD: fix deny mode logic in nfs4_upgrade_open
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc:     Pumpkin <cc85nod@gmail.com>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20230202073611.13106-1-cc85nod@gmail.com>
 <CBAFB3E5-5737-47A7-8234-3A771E908C4F@oracle.com>
 <7b7edc8bacb863915d00673f9e03d38798341a69.camel@kernel.org>
 <CE064BB1-510B-4268-A92E-8DAC680AAA22@oracle.com>
From:   dai.ngo@oracle.com
In-Reply-To: <CE064BB1-510B-4268-A92E-8DAC680AAA22@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?utf-8?B?azI5ZGJhU09JYTNvckUvb2dlRTY5aFZDVjlaZVJxZmZQV1ZFVGlXL2RqT2s0?=
 =?utf-8?B?aEM4K2lyTEsxZWJLckkvKzJyZG1qU2dXcFNwZzRGbStjMjZIUFVJQ05venQx?=
 =?utf-8?B?bWQwWmE0dnE2N3dicTBKM3lqOWVXWU9oYVc3RDE3eXBiQlFiSlpaV3FNKzVx?=
 =?utf-8?B?SDdxRWN4K3FMTmhxa0JsQkNqOVFWQUg1UGYyMmE0OGpxcFJHaWt3U09PMFFn?=
 =?utf-8?B?M09sNGJEU3VUa2VRUmZWenhlTkF6YmxiNGlHNlppdm5lZjFhakhvaXlCTVNk?=
 =?utf-8?B?Qi9SN2habDVxWk91cXh0WVlKRVdwVmJ1QlhtVVZNOUl6ZW5IY2NpN3MvQ0Z3?=
 =?utf-8?B?YTdxdWhFWHJpMlgvYWEycHQ1cHQ1b3dISVJFOHpkOWk4czYyaFZtbUlqVTYz?=
 =?utf-8?B?SUpOWU4vZXh0ME4rcWpTUk1XUHNMNVU1QWg5UGNPenVpOFltckxsT0tHc3U4?=
 =?utf-8?B?MnZQbnN3ajVzV1poazAzeXB1cDdGc0RQcFYxZWZ4bU5DK09rVGRvUUFvdFJK?=
 =?utf-8?B?RnhyWGlsYjlIeC9wZWEyWXFsM01EeXNUcTlNK1EwaE9CZWpFQjM3dG9tMjFh?=
 =?utf-8?B?YTlvdGJvK2swY0NHQ0RUSHc2NytyRkZyKzJ3eGI1S1NkZ0JadzAvV3BoU20r?=
 =?utf-8?B?YVpGUjBLNUVJT2paWmlERXJXTlVvZDV5aHBiRUkzK2pKbUwzTGtnU0k3YnF2?=
 =?utf-8?B?amdZUmFwSGJILzFPL0hQYzZSQnhkei9qV3A4dVVGYXlaTTFXUURvaHE2TlZ0?=
 =?utf-8?B?amFEY0luVVBFYVVnVm9kaUEwMW1TVWRVNlZTcWFlb1F3S1NxaStFVFlkWjI0?=
 =?utf-8?B?VkxmQjRGVW9DZVMvNFdaVEg0aFlxb2RPaE9BcjJqWEdLTGhBOGwzc3E1U1Q0?=
 =?utf-8?B?Wm1Ia0VRUmk4OHpQY2pTNUc0WU5GRFkvUzJGZmYrUGVjc0ZNRk16WGhwSjZn?=
 =?utf-8?B?OXVIRFZJY0VxbmlQWGVFMXMydnQveWlScFhsTmpZWVU0Wi9wNWdLUzh6dXp2?=
 =?utf-8?B?K0tZQ1NDSE5qUTQ5WU1kM2RvdURyeEFPRDFLeFRxWWtxaHhBaWxTVTV6aU1j?=
 =?utf-8?B?OHN5dy94dS8wdWtud2RPcC9JdW9ycjc2cVliSzNXdVAvbGpiUjZqUEoyRnI5?=
 =?utf-8?B?N0ovVFF4bjJ0UlVZaFg2RWEyU0dZY3hyaEdyd3JLeFdsUUZKKzZzQUV2TEJJ?=
 =?utf-8?B?dlRWVWw5eXkyVkhjK3IxZkdLVFRlcEJzSUoxdm40UFhhNDZLN1MyZzdKQ0to?=
 =?utf-8?B?bjdyb0lYU1IvTlRMRkkrMVV1eGUvSnMxOWFrcmxENnROYmwvTXkzSlJVSzk5?=
 =?utf-8?B?bXNXQWtKUjEzdlN5WUhHUjlZY1ZzTnlkbGZVQlREemk3aDg0eS9nZkIyUitK?=
 =?utf-8?B?dVpBZW9VdWxab3dnYkFVTG54M21DV1R4emswNnJKeGV6Qld0Q1BlS2FmZEpD?=
 =?utf-8?B?VFp6Y0VoYmJ1TUhBb3I2YnpzQVdVYnZ0T3pMbzk4ZXRxc1I0b3N3cENJRUxY?=
 =?utf-8?B?aFJ4ZTc3a2NjL1F2N3p5eVcrNUZlMURibzZtdGhzWDdwQ1N6cW45V3VVbVdr?=
 =?utf-8?B?andPQ0w5bTRYRm9tOUdpUE9CTmFmM0ZXcjBzbUJhTmtxSXBPZFpsNmMvNWVF?=
 =?utf-8?B?dE1JUkQzVXV6VDhzZm5yTFNGVFZEZGJHWllobjVtNnpmYXpKT3l1ejhFWkEx?=
 =?utf-8?B?ZTR6NXZRS3QxRFpxelZoallrZ2dHNnRVTHpZRThER09vUi9zN09Uenl3RE1u?=
 =?utf-8?B?MWxHUnRLNlhCc1VqVWsyellDc0QyNGJ1aklFZmR5R2NFQ0RPbUNIbGFodi83?=
 =?utf-8?B?SkpYcUdqcEJCaUNvV05ITXVWZUxVOXUwQnJvREpOMFZrVVpFNloyMDYzdDJC?=
 =?utf-8?B?aEZSRU1XZ3Z0NTUvSjB5MUFackV1SG5ZeFk2WjZOQ2RXSUZ5bXRZMXhQT3h6?=
 =?utf-8?B?b0xJcWljbG83eTZoK1FhTjlqaWhwZFA4VDZJOGdWUTRDR1NLRStyOVRZckdh?=
 =?utf-8?B?SlZCYmlBVjI1MlpvSU95QUNxT3F1MTQzTDRKQ1RPaWpIdGNxZU92dG03TGxO?=
 =?utf-8?B?S1Vndis0VWFjMnhxTW9WRStaeEtYeWo0TWdXamRaSm1ZMFlLakNndWNaOTZn?=
 =?utf-8?Q?cr6V4pue4KAaCR4lR05ygzNLA?=
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-ExternalHop-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-ExternalHop-MessageData-0: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: oracle.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 50360ee7-8e93-4789-aae6-08db061022dd
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BY5PR10MB4257.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2023 17:57:37.9596
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 4e2c6054-71cb-48f1-bd6c-3a9705aca71b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: PAFuF1fYLxnIsIw490ViJUjswnal1NEk5EDaGsR/4Cq6NseW0bEY9MHTVr4mCTOsN2VXcL5IRYCAgzIHh0Q4eg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: IA1PR10MB6051
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard
 engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.122.1
 definitions=2023-02-03_17,2023-02-03_01,2022-06-22_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=901 phishscore=0
 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0
 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1
 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2302030164
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: bdCjdjzO5L6HRZaF3TGdkqCNUTQIAR1j
X-Proofpoint-GUID: bdCjdjzO5L6HRZaF3TGdkqCNUTQIAR1j
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On 2/3/23 6:50 AM, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>
>> On Feb 2, 2023, at 4:22 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 19:41 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>> On Feb 2, 2023, at 2:36 AM, Pumpkin <cc85nod@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If the upgrading deny mode is invalid or conflicts with other client, we
>>>> should try to resolve it, but the if-condition makes those error handling
>>>> cannot be executed.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pumpkin <cc85nod@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>>>> index 4ef529379..ebdfaf0f9 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>>>> @@ -5298,7 +5298,7 @@ nfs4_upgrade_open(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfs4_file *fp,
>>>> 	/* test and set deny mode */
>>>> 	spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
>>>> 	status = nfs4_file_check_deny(fp, open->op_share_deny);
>>>> -	if (status == nfs_ok) {
>>>> +	if (status != nfs_ok) {
>>>> 		if (status != nfserr_share_denied) {
>>> if status == nfs_ok then status will definitely not equal
>>> share_denied. So this check is a bit nonsensical as it stands.
>>>
>>> Usually I prefer "switch (status)" in situations like this
>>> because that avoids this kind of issue and I find it easier
>>> to read quickly.
>>>
>>> Jeff, you are the original author of this function, and
>>> Dai, your commit is the last one to touch this area. Can
>>> you guys have a look? The one-liner looks correct, but I
>>> might be missing something.
>>>
>> Yeah, that code is clearly broken and it looks like it was done in
>> 3d69427151806 (NFSD: add support for share reservation conflict to
>> courteous server).
>>
>> I don't believe that one-liner is correct though. If the result is
>> nfs_ok, then we want to set the deny mode here and that won't happen.
>>
>> Something like this maybe? (completely untested):
>>
>> ---------------8<-------------------
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index c39e43742dd6..af22dfdc6fcc 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -5282,16 +5282,17 @@ nfs4_upgrade_open(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfs4_file *fp,
>>         /* test and set deny mode */
>>         spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
>>         status = nfs4_file_check_deny(fp, open->op_share_deny);
>> -       if (status == nfs_ok) {
>> -               if (status != nfserr_share_denied) {
>> -                       set_deny(open->op_share_deny, stp);
>> -                       fp->fi_share_deny |=
>> -                               (open->op_share_deny & NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH);
>> -               } else {
>> -                       if (nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked(fp, false,
>> -                                       stp, open->op_share_deny, false))
>> -                               status = nfserr_jukebox;
>> -               }
>> +       switch (status) {
>> +       case nfs_ok:
>> +               set_deny(open->op_share_deny, stp);
>> +               fp->fi_share_deny |=
>> +                       (open->op_share_deny & NFS4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH);
>> +               break;
>> +       case nfserr_share_denied:
>> +               if (nfs4_resolve_deny_conflicts_locked(fp, false,
>> +                               stp, open->op_share_deny, false))
>> +                       status = nfserr_jukebox;
>> +               break;
>>         }
>>         spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> Would pynfs have a case or two that could test this?

pynfs has tests for open upgrade and downgrade but it only
tests the upgrade/downgrade functionality without any deny mode
and only from 1 client.

We need a test that does open upgrade/downgrade with share
deny mode and with 2 clients, one is courtesy client. I will
look into creating one.

-Dai

>
> Can you post an official version of this patch with Reported-by
> and Fixes tags?
>
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>