Message-ID: <6a9fcdc9-3fe7-e8fc-3a51-385d516c6323@samsung.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2023 23:50:41 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0)
        Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: dts: exynos: move exynos-bus nodes out of soc
 in Exynos4412
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     replicant@osuosl.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_J=c3=bccker?= <martin.juecker@gmail.com>,
        Henrik Grimler <henrik@grimler.se>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
From:   Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
In-Reply-To: <697aa7b5-9c9b-eb4f-8111-c9a396d9d191@linaro.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 201P
References: <20230125094513.155063-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
        <20230125094513.155063-5-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
        <CGME20230129104220eucas1p15b70f73be86fa5600cfe170d22869836@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
        <29841f64-360b-1426-e1fd-dd4c64ee5455@linaro.org>
        <b3f31e71-fa1a-e0c0-fdfa-f65674ccc5cd@samsung.com>
        <d54792c5-2842-e5b9-26b8-1f52471211a9@linaro.org>
        <111f7364-0d7b-b4c5-721f-69c00d4619e2@samsung.com>
        <dc0c3fa9-a6d4-e1c1-7cc8-13b206e3b31f@linaro.org>
        <697aa7b5-9c9b-eb4f-8111-c9a396d9d191@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

On 03.02.2023 22:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/02/2023 21:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/02/2023 12:51, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> On 03.02.2023 12:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 03/02/2023 12:45, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>>> On 29.01.2023 11:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> On 25/01/2023 10:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>>> The soc node is supposed to have only device nodes with MMIO addresses,
>>>>>>> as reported by dtc W=1:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      exynos4412.dtsi:407.20-413.5:
>>>>>>>        Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/bus-acp: missing or empty reg/ranges property
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and dtbs_check:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      exynos4412-i9300.dtb: soc: bus-acp:
>>>>>>>        {'compatible': ['samsung,exynos-bus'], 'clocks': [[7, 456]], 'clock-names': ['bus'], 'operating-points-v2': [[132]], 'status': ['okay'], 'devfreq': [[117]]} should not be valid under {'type': 'object'}
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Move the bus nodes and their OPP tables out of SoC to fix this.
>>>>>>> Re-order them alphabetically while moving and put some of the OPP tables
>>>>>>> in device nodes (if they are not shared).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Applied.
>>>>> I don't have a good news. It looks that this change is responsible for
>>>>> breaking boards that were rock-stable so far, like Odroid U3. I didn't
>>>>> manage to analyze what exactly causes the issue, but it looks that the
>>>>> exynos-bus devfreq driver somehow depends on the order of the nodes:
>>>>>
>>>>> (before)
>>>>>
>>>>> # dmesg | grep exynos-bus
>>>>> [    6.415266] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-dmc
>>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 400000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.422717] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-acp
>>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 267000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.454323] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-c2c
>>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 400000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.489944] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-leftbus
>>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.493990] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-rightbus
>>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.494612] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-display
>>>>> (160000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.494932] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-fsys
>>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 134000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.495246] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-peri (
>>>>> 50000 KHz ~ 100000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.495577] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: soc:bus-mfc
>>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>>>
>>>>> (after)
>>>>>
>>>>> # dmesg | grep exynos-bus
>>>>>
>>>>> [    6.082032] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-dmc (100000
>>>>> KHz ~ 400000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.122726] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-leftbus
>>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.146705] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-mfc (100000
>>>>> KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.181632] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-peri ( 50000
>>>>> KHz ~ 100000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.204770] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-rightbus
>>>>> (100000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.211087] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-acp (100000
>>>>> KHz ~ 267000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.216936] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-c2c (100000
>>>>> KHz ~ 400000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.225748] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-display
>>>>> (160000 KHz ~ 200000 KHz)
>>>>> [    6.242978] exynos-bus: new bus device registered: bus-fsys (100000
>>>>> KHz ~ 134000 KHz)
>>>>>
>>>>> This is definitely a driver bug, but so far it worked fine, so this is a
>>>>> regression that need to be addressed somehow...
>>>> Thanks for checking, but what is exactly the bug? The devices registered
>>>> - just with different name.
>>> The bug is that the board fails to boot from time to time, freezing
>>> after registering PPMU counters...
>> My U3 with and without this patch, reports several warnings:
>> iommu_group_do_set_platform_dma()
>> exynos_iommu_domain_free()
>> clk_core_enable()
>>
>> and finally:
>> rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
>>
>> and keeps stalling.
>>
>> At least on next-20230203. Except all these (which anyway make board
>> unbootable) look fine around PMU and exynos-bus.
> I also booted few times my next/dt branch (with this patch) and no
> problems. How reproducible is the issue you experience?

IOMMU needs a fixup, that has been merged today:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230123093102.12392-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/

I was initially convinced that this freeze is somehow related to this 
IOMMU fixup, but it turned out that the devfreq is a source of the problems.

The freeze happens here about 1 of 10 boots, usually with kernel 
compiled from multi_v7_defconfig, while loading the PPMU modules. It 
happens on your next/dt branch too.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland