Date:   Sat, 4 Feb 2023 01:26:46 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     Rakesh.Sankaranarayanan@microchip.com
Cc:     andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
        Woojung.Huh@microchip.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 04/11] net: dsa: microchip: lan937x: update
 port number for LAN9373
Message-ID: <20230203232646.fwnvovw5ssbo7cpj@skbuf>
References: <20230202125930.271740-1-rakesh.sankaranarayanan@microchip.com>
 <20230202125930.271740-5-rakesh.sankaranarayanan@microchip.com>
 <Y9vUflgHqpk44oYl@lunn.ch>
 <e4344f16e1c0a87b533ad9d87c2306dc53214308.camel@microchip.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <e4344f16e1c0a87b533ad9d87c2306dc53214308.camel@microchip.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 10:43:40AM +0000, Rakesh.Sankaranarayanan@microchip.com wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 16:19 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > LAN9373 have total 8 physical ports. Update port_cnt member in
> > > ksz_chip_data structure.
> > 
> > This seems more like a fix. Should it be applied to net, not net-
> > next,
> > and have Fixes: tag?
> > 
> > ??? Andrew
> 
> Yes, I will update and send it as separate net patch with fixes tag.

What's the story here? Arun must have surely known this isn't a 5 port switch?