Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EB1C636CC for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 18:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233260AbjBDSTB (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Feb 2023 13:19:01 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231230AbjBDSS6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Feb 2023 13:18:58 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1492B302A0; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 10:18:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1675534737; x=1707070737; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LJ4cMeZIdCvh32LatinduqIdFOt1FGNQelyqXlGY+gw=; b=NRNC/1Z1tJ6CMu/0A8Lqg6VranTkxOaPNK9u6VsA4JXf3HCjtpk7IEA4 dBjl+00NzJ5C9VO1jdnTGihz8JaTZK8zp6h7DL9UA19FlB/fvpv1LaDc7 upiIGnyCZpRrg0UOig/opJtu1DgO8mbuLQA4PSaNLV42KObPGf974ywQe Jwefs14SSEB0t5elhOBkJtVB4IGjuDGYlEqrW+Y99xPg94WCsQGUON/54 xYxRu41+jSLpyRjk7DuYc3U5rO9XTdTt5yY4ztWpmRCGI0kG/DF8lIHEk kc8fOOHLawy4dESY/6UQfJr3cLXbdFEXYgMyaVNeLl6SX1Wt3gEYEFmpV A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10611"; a="312629890" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,272,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="312629890" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2023 10:18:56 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10611"; a="696455105" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,272,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="696455105" Received: from gmekkari-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.209.74.85]) ([10.209.74.85]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2023 10:18:55 -0800 Message-ID: <5ba476f3-e0ac-d630-ce1d-18ab9885496f@linux.intel.com> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 10:18:55 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/11] x86/smpboot: Disable parallel boot for AMD CPUs Content-Language: en-US To: David Woodhouse , Kim Phillips , Usama Arif , tglx@linutronix.de Cc: mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, mimoja@mimoja.de, hewenliang4@huawei.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, seanjc@google.com, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de, fam.zheng@bytedance.com, punit.agrawal@bytedance.com, simon.evans@bytedance.com, liangma@liangbit.com, Mario Limonciello References: <20230202215625.3248306-1-usama.arif@bytedance.com> <20230202215625.3248306-8-usama.arif@bytedance.com> From: Arjan van de Ven In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > However... > > Even though we *can* support non-X2APIC processors, we *might* want to > play it safe and not go back that far; only enabling parallel bringup > on machines with X2APIC which roughly correlates with "lots of CPUs" > since that's where the benefit is. I think that this is the right approach, at least on the initial patch series. KISS principle; do all the easy-but-important cases first, get it stable and working and in later series/kernels the range can be expanded.... if it matters. > > >