Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900A7C636CD for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 07:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229541AbjBEHuN (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2023 02:50:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59424 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229448AbjBEHuL (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2023 02:50:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650FD1EFD8 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 23:50:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id c4-20020a1c3504000000b003d9e2f72093so8743638wma.1 for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 23:50:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=RGcXZBAIMnr/TsEMbIoAFaGg+i6HpqoM4umiMvHSXsY=; b=jlzmcxgR7DmdfFvEvxbNsvYPYITMzruP8BdHF3wGFq/yv/YRpMp1UhDvmP5cwexkl1 6nhIc8Nvjc8xSVGj3ysY1C9U4pMvBeiLauTFCkJpZRv4eplyWfpPwCKptPnnm5rzwhyV CBBiFfJuDGMQOmazph6Xj9bNRnXD6Bu/TMe+NnTg9/re9PSLXIh1dLMaEFxlduEmzgSk pvcMHmVj8AvAB0lvnxopAvlrTGd6YRo+Q4jlaAhPepeknID1OVGI0uBHlWJ5zH0kYhU+ UQ7otS6IBZyuY4CH8RN6/DBqGVGv0n4Ep5ut8CKWcHmXOvEmxGNtTId0/jbH7Wy0UreH uHbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RGcXZBAIMnr/TsEMbIoAFaGg+i6HpqoM4umiMvHSXsY=; b=dcmiThdXnU3EqdDTANk0QYjm93moo8rAt7vKpkECQpT1RbTd5Eec8JeRnv5XkPQhvm OMmmm74MtDDOTfdsnok38MeGAPIRzMd3x5GZJ8ZPN//IS4phO9rnqriuQDxXVEr+JhIx F2zfBEyShZtKLoXdPDWXxqHWf6NdkUOFvTcX0nyiNGNMYnusKbYG3uu02py9HJD1A1V1 tUMLrtFYI0X3sTgiaO1p6tF+lQPX/UaD64oyhR58kPcncLDS2rV7QCMU4xuB/UIB+fQk 4sMd3SoM2t32naC3XwkkKKuoI51Vs/4RssOtORBaVkGjB4F8Himy71N04tgbht3/Y4Qy S9Dg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUYZh9saaFLPEDEPQyf9IoGzbu8S3Yvr4M2yPo3xgl07TvvgS8o oIlksTWKKgv3i/9aL9Bj07QNMUfUPiQHLjJn X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9i3Wg9geRPcKCToiq1uM76wLLsPDmKe6vevpzuS6JFS76d9n+X21n8090RZOqH+jRxfq+XhQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f96:b0:3cf:9844:7b11 with SMTP id n22-20020a05600c4f9600b003cf98447b11mr17285790wmq.23.1675583408810; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 23:50:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([109.253.184.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q10-20020a05600c330a00b003dc3f195abesm7449414wmp.39.2023.02.04.23.50.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Feb 2023 23:50:08 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.300.101.1.3\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kprobes: Fix 1 byte conditional jump target From: Nadav Amit In-Reply-To: <20230204210807.3930-1-namit@vmware.com> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 09:49:56 +0200 Cc: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , X86 ML , kernel list , Masami Hiramatsu , Peter Zijlstra Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5DFB6E19-210E-4EA8-8D71-66FF4A787942@gmail.com> References: <20230204210807.3930-1-namit@vmware.com> To: Thomas Gleixner X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.300.101.1.3) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Feb 4, 2023, at 11:08 PM, Nadav Amit wrote: >=20 > From: Nadav Amit >=20 > Commit 3bc753c06dd0 ("kbuild: treat char as always unsigned") broke > kprobes. Setting a probe-point on 1 byte conditional jump can cause = the > kernel to crash, as the branch target is not sign extended. >=20 > Fix by using s8 instead of char and use immediate.value instead of > immediate.bytes for consistency. I guess I forgot to put a =E2=80=9CFixes=E2=80=9D tag, since it is still = not a real regression. (The bug was introduced in 6.2). Still, this fix should not fall between the cracks=E2=80=A6 Please let = me know whether v2 is needed with a =E2=80=9Cfixes=E2=80=9D tag.