Date:   Sun, 5 Feb 2023 14:30:59 +0100
From:   Guru Mehar Rachaputi <gurumeharrachaputi@gmail.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Forest Bond <forest@alittletooquiet.net>,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: vt6655: Macro with braces issue change to
 inline function
Message-ID: <Y9+vkwYfQzYTbIIo@combine-ThinkPad-S1-Yoga>
References: <Y9+qMqYD2zGWRurD@combine-ThinkPad-S1-Yoga>
 <Y9+sFw0rviTAJNMf@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y9+sFw0rviTAJNMf@kroah.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:16:07PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:08:02PM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote:
> > This patch is to fix checkpatch warning: "Macro argument 'iobase' may be better
> > as '(iobase)' to avoid precedence issues"
> > 
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > 	- Whitespace error from checkpatch fixed
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > 	- Macros with one statement that is to call 'iowrite8' function changed
> > 	to inline function as reviewed by gregkh@linuxfoundation.org.
> > 	In relation to this, names of the callers of macro are also modified
> > 	to call this function.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guru Mehar Rachaputi <gurumeharrachaputi@gmail.com>
> 
> Try to take this patch and apply it to a tree, and see that everything
> below the --- line is thrown away, including your signed-off-by: line :(
> 
Sorry, should not a patch contain signed-off-by: line?
I did not understand.

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Guru