Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B480C636CC for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 16:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229643AbjBEQTx (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2023 11:19:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54984 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229511AbjBEQTq (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2023 11:19:46 -0500 Received: from elvis.franken.de (elvis.franken.de [193.175.24.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADD5900E; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 08:19:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1pOhjy-0000RS-03; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 17:19:42 +0100 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EDE31C265A; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 17:19:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 17:19:29 +0100 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Olliver Schinagl Cc: Sander Vanheule , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: Realtek RTL: select NO_EXCEPT_FILL Message-ID: <20230205161929.GD4459@alpha.franken.de> References: <20230115121922.6359-1-sander@svanheule.net> <20230127162755.GB6090@alpha.franken.de> <46724036-fabf-7bae-41f8-1e95c5f1db5c@schinagl.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46724036-fabf-7bae-41f8-1e95c5f1db5c@schinagl.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 03:39:59PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > Thanks Thomas, may I take this moment to poke you about a nother issue I > don't quite understand how to resolve/figure out. > > > I made the realtek target work with the GENERIC_MIPS_KERNEL, but only if I > disable SWAP_IO_SPACE[0]. is this little endian or big endian ? > While I could act all smart and ask what this is for, I better ask, why is > this concidered 'generic'. The comment in mangle-port [1] mentions 'sane > hardware'. I don't know what is considered sane here, as the number of > targets following generic mips seem to be around 5. I always thought that SWAP_IO_SPACE is needed for big endian, but looking at arch/mips/Kconfig I see a lot of SWAP_IO_SPACE for pure little endian machines. I need to dig deeper to understand why. > So any pointers (other then doing SWAP_IO_SPACE if !REALTEK_SOC, which I > have now) would be appreciated such a change would defeat the generic part of GENERIC_MIPS_KERNEL, because it will then only work on REALTEC_SOC and nothing else. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]