Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758097AbXIBPAd (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 11:00:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755363AbXIBPAX (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 11:00:23 -0400 Received: from barikada.upol.cz ([158.194.242.200]:55552 "EHLO barikada.upol.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755202AbXIBPAW (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 11:00:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 17:15:21 +0200 To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Bj?rn Steinbrink , Matti Aarnio , David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] good job guys with the anti-spam ! Message-ID: <20070902151521.GE475@flower.upol.cz> References: <20070731214011.GA17735@1wt.eu> <20070902003936.GA8005@atjola.homenet> <20070902012353.GC475@flower.upol.cz> <20070902081836.GA14728@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070902081836.GA14728@1wt.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Oleg Verych Organization: Palacky University in Olomouc, experimental physics department X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-glibc-debian Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1706 Lines: 43 On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:18:36AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: [] > > Your method as i mentioned > makes it trivial for them to request 1 ticket, then send 10000 mails > which will be accepted without ever being filtered. It will result in > an increase of the number of spams and a great annoyance for the users. It's metter of experiment to know how much spammers today * compose messages with non outloock default headers * have *valid* reply address ** if it's valid and message to get ticket looks spammy as well as message after ticket does, address gets blacklisted forever * bother about published email address' policy > Not for me, thanks :-/ You know, after requests like "we need more man power to handle mail lists" i wonder in what century we are leaving XXI or IIX? OTHO Gmane is an excellent example of applying NNTP structure, that is very superior to mailing lists concept. But as i mentioned, i don't know whole story about USENET vs Mailing lists. I just speculate, that latter was established as an private entity, that groups of people can handle as they need and want. But NNTP isn't USENET, and only Gmane shows how it lets people like me to handle tens of thousand emails in nearly 60 mailing lists (not only reading up to date, but archives easily). And frankly, i just pissed off by "6 day lkml archive, please", "Adrian, your email is bouncing, bla bla...". I'd better see spam, then dumb things like that, see? ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/