Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2023 15:56:57 -0800
From:   David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To:     Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Cc:     seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, bgardon@google.com,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 3/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize SPTE change for aging gfn
 range
Message-ID: <Y+GTyVHvpskr8YxD@google.com>
References: <20230203192822.106773-1-vipinsh@google.com>
 <20230203192822.106773-4-vipinsh@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230203192822.106773-4-vipinsh@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 11:28:20AM -0800, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> No need to check all of the conditions in __handle_changed_spte(). Aging
> a gfn range implies resetting access bit or marking spte for access
> tracking.
> 
> Use atomic operation to only reset those bits. This avoids checking many
> conditions in __handle_changed_spte() API. Also, clean up code by
> removing dead code and API parameters.

Suggest splitting out the dead code cleanup to make it easier to review.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 68 ++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 83f15052aa6c..18630a06fa1f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -1251,32 +1228,37 @@ static __always_inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
>  /*
>   * Mark the SPTEs range of GFNs [start, end) unaccessed and return non-zero
>   * if any of the GFNs in the range have been accessed.
> + *
> + * No need to mark corresponding PFN as accessed as this call is coming from
> + * MMU notifier for that page via HVA.

Thanks for adding this comment.

Can you just extend it to mention that the information is passed via the
return value? e.g.

 * No need to mark corresponding PFN as accessed as this call is coming
 * from the clear_young() or clear_flush_young() notifier, which uses
 * the return value to determine if the page has been accessed.