Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2023 09:45:12 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc:     Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>, ilia.lin@kernel.org,
        agross@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, rafael@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: reuse socinfo SMEM item struct
Message-ID: <20230207041512.rxeeg52wduxsfgk7@vireshk-i7>
References: <20230121112947.53433-1-robimarko@gmail.com>
 <20230121112947.53433-2-robimarko@gmail.com>
 <20230206203816.afexndkiqhpk6e7b@ripper>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230206203816.afexndkiqhpk6e7b@ripper>
Precedence: bulk

On 06-02-23, 12:38, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 12:29:45PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> > Now that socinfo SMEM item struct and defines have been moved to a header
> > so we can utilize that instead.
> > 
> > Now the SMEM value can be accesed directly, there is no need for defining
> > the ID for the SMEM request as well.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> 
> @Rafael, @Viresh, would you mind providing an Ack for me to take these 3
> patches, together with patch 1, through the Qualcomm tree? I have staged
> changes for 6.3, so we'll otherwise end up with conflicts on the move of
> the struct.

For all cpufreq patches.

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh