Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE036C636CD for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 08:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230425AbjBGITh (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2023 03:19:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52186 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229512AbjBGITf (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2023 03:19:35 -0500 Received: from msg-1.mailo.com (msg-1.mailo.com [213.182.54.11]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED2791C315 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 00:19:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mailo.com; s=mailo; t=1675757960; bh=3IiCGcrw4xj573+K8SFh+QMAVskXXAOLc02ZrGFVO3Q=; h=X-EA-Auth:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=Yn1lglzpPCMVc+52/nPcQ1j7o21LJcn3E4OmrcP6hmlU9T50NM5gzv25hGB56VsiP AvQSJ0bxBiAdqE1Fn1qwDiF4M6SbKRCjCGUmIm6i5cTKKoE4AGnFW2wONvkOOd706r WnyvU+kMM5vZx5PWotpFESMdOIVnm5Fpholl1Wpc= Received: by b-4.in.mailobj.net [192.168.90.14] with ESMTP via ip-206.mailobj.net [213.182.55.206] Tue, 7 Feb 2023 09:19:19 +0100 (CET) X-EA-Auth: zjPZTGBDpI1IITH79TEFYuxqQypz+N56QVndvDxk+bXMkOlFXwS/0w5mE/dX0D31VIFd/CmuNi238AMTlnE/UERr8P3rozoG Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 13:49:15 +0530 From: Deepak R Varma To: Guru Mehar Rachaputi Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christophe JAILLET , Forest Bond , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: vt6655: Macro with braces issue change to inline function Message-ID: References: <3cb45313-209a-8190-12f8-6a2d49e4173b@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 08:25:57AM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 10:43:56AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:39:08AM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote: > > good luck! > > > > greg k-h > > Thanks for taking time. > > If my understanding is correct, every version of the patch should > include all the patches/patchfiles and it should explain what happened in each > version(in decrement order) through a coverletter. Please correct me otherwise. Hi Guru, Other than the cover letter, each individual patch should also include the patch version history in the descending order. If a specific patch(es) that is/are part of a patch-set, did not have any change, we should still increment its version and record "none" as the change in current version for such patches. However, from the patch-set, any patches that are acked, do not need to be resent along with other patches that are still under revision. But do mentioned about such accepted/acked patches in the cover letter. Hope this helps. Thanks, deepak. > > I do refer "first patch submission" and above is my current > understanding. > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Guru >