Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2023 22:07:38 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To:     Ziyang Zhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/3] ublk: mention WRITE_ZEROES in comment of
 ublk_complete_rq()
Message-ID: <Y+JbKrbExeQ7uIvC@T590>
References: <20230207070839.370817-1-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
 <20230207070839.370817-3-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230207070839.370817-3-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 03:08:38PM +0800, Ziyang Zhang wrote:
> WRITE_ZEROES won't return bytes returned just like FLUSH and DISCARD,
> and we can end it directly. Add missing comment for it in
> ublk_complete_rq().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Zhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index 55fccce68a9c..06eddefdf02a 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ static void ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req)
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * FLUSH or DISCARD usually won't return bytes returned, so end them
> +	 * FLUSH, DISCARD or WRITE_ZEROES usually won't return bytes returned, so end them
>  	 * directly.
>  	 *
>  	 * Both the two needn't unmap.

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>


Thanks, 
Ming