Message-ID: <87e31545-3107-1cc2-fc93-197f66712ccc@starfivetech.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Feb 2023 10:31:35 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.3.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Basic pinctrl support for StarFive JH7110 RISC-V
 SoC
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
CC:     <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
        "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>,
        Jianlong Huang <jianlong.huang@starfivetech.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20230203141801.59083-1-hal.feng@starfivetech.com>
From:   Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230203141801.59083-1-hal.feng@starfivetech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 22:17:57 +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
> This patch series adds basic pinctrl support for StarFive JH7110 SoC.
> 
> Changes since v3:
> - Rebased on Linus's "devel" branch of linux-pinctrl repo, which was based on
>   on tag v6.2-rc1.
> - Dropped patch 1.
> Patch 2 & 3:
> - Added a reference for '-pins$' patternProperties.
> - Put "additionalProperties: false" before properties section. (by Rob)
> - Improved the description.
> - Changed the node name in examples from "gpio" to "pinctrl".
> Patch 4:
> - Added some missing headers. (by Andreas)
> 
>   v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221220005529.34744-1-hal.feng@starfivetech.com/

Hi, Linus,

I have resent the patches rebased on your "devel" branch. Rob has added
Reviewed-by tags for DT bindings, but the DT binding patches still need
to be modified a little bit. Could you apply this series if I modify the
DT bindings patches and resend as v5? Or it need another round of review?

Best regards,
Hal