Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3F1C636D6 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 02:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230302AbjBHCwP (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2023 21:52:15 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59278 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229803AbjBHCwM (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2023 21:52:12 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA6D3BD94; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 18:52:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1182DB81B9F; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 02:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D1CDC433EF; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 02:52:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1675824727; bh=b/rkymYs8+pjheRuYyegq/Om1XooZkZ/LI4pZoJDRVo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=IaDVTGhkKI4ZBPjAlHb+gUIHgeBKmxo0U2I2yRvZB4o8li5UpeKZxMQDVwKZyMxlt Ufp8DeaHUML/fopNaEwYMhBvqvRnMs3L3D5fUhAjaVfoViLCeDqrlOaiLDBMNMJQb+ javTqb2h8S4BgtHWDphOip3EWRCzvkgEUXm2BWkoAomtOavGdD/L4gG+2CP/VfNfxh nLTbwBf36NZNOdDir7tmEfJ/9ltqeOqls0Y/7H6XIy00wqMlnGIE2n43S1pD0KjNgF qQq4s0rDMVNCxNP0SiNHT3sNcoEGn2d2fJ77WQ5HtJs4bxiOuRXq/7o6kh44eswyfK zjmJn3zepZU6A== Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 04:52:02 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: James Bottomley , Linux regressions mailing list , Peter Huewe , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, LKML , reach622@mailcuk.com, 1138267643@qq.com Subject: Re: [regression] Bug 216989 - since 6.1 systems with AMD Ryzen stutter when fTPM is enabled Message-ID: References: <3a196414-68d8-29c9-24cc-2b8cb4c9d358@leemhuis.info> <8a7775912f31394944b43db12adc78efd84b1fad.camel@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 11:31:37PM -0300, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 11:13 PM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 04:13:16AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 07:57:37AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 11:28 +0100, Linux kernel regression tracking > > > > (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > So it's a firmware problem, but apparently one that Linux only > > > > > triggers since 6.1. > > > > > > > > > > Jason, could the hwrng changes have anything to do with this? > > > > > > > > > > A bisection really would be helpful, but I guess that is not easy as > > > > > the problem apparently only shows up after some time... > > > > > > > > the problem description says the fTPM causes system stutter when it > > > > writes to NVRAM. Since an fTPM is a proprietary implementation, we > > > > don't know what it does. The ms TPM implementation definitely doesn't > > > > trigger NV writes on rng requests, but it is plausible this fTPM does > > > > ... particularly if they have a time based input to the DRNG. Even if > > > > this speculation is true, there's not much we can do about it, since > > > > it's a firmware bug and AMD should have delivered the BIOS update that > > > > fixes it. > > > > > > > > The way to test this would be to set the config option > > > > > > > > CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TPM=n > > > > > > > > and see if the stutter goes away. I suppose if someone could quantify > > > > the bad bioses, we could warn, but that's about it. > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > And e.g. I do not have a Ryzen CPU so pretty hard to answer such question. > > > > ... about hwrng > > Well, the options here are basically: > > a) Do nothing, and just expect people to update their BIOSes, since an > update is available. > b) Do nothing, and expect people with broken BIOSes to `echo blacklist > tpm >> /etc/modprobesomethingsomething`. > c) Figure out how to identify the buggy BIOS and disable the TPM's rng > with a quirk in this case. > d) Figure out how to dynamically detect TPM rng latency, and warn about it. > e) Figure out how to dynamically detect TPM rng latency, and disable it. > > I think given that a firmware update *is* available, (a) is fine. And > the generic workaround remains (b). But if you want to be really nice, > (c) would be fine too. Somebody with the affected hardware would > probably have to send in some DMI logs or whatever else. (d) and (e) > sound possible in theory but I dunno really... seems finicky. > > Jason For now (a), but if someone with capable hardware can make up something I'm happy to go that through, if it makes sense. BR, Jarkko