Message-ID: <e3ee64da-e8d9-ba8d-f4d4-f166b7ca825f@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Feb 2023 11:45:15 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:96.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/96.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] nvmem: brcm_nvram: use bcm47xx buffered data
To:     =?UTF-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>,
        Willem-Jan de Hoog <wdehoog@exalondelft.nl>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc:     =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <rafal@milecki.pl>,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <cover.1675717472.git.wdehoog@exalondelft.nl>
 <e179c12f73a6035690e814b842f677bbb38f5c96.1675717472.git.wdehoog@exalondelft.nl>
 <0496ff17-0a02-1192-3c9a-412656a38b6a@gmail.com>
 <2e2ff1ec-34a9-db77-64d2-c088e5f1a13d@arinc9.com>
From:   =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2e2ff1ec-34a9-db77-64d2-c088e5f1a13d@arinc9.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 8.02.2023 11:29, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 8.02.2023 13:25, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 7.02.2023 09:42, Willem-Jan de Hoog wrote:
>>> From: Willem-Jan de Hoog <wdehoog@exalondelft.nl>
>>>
>>> The bcm47xx module has a copy of the NVRAM data in ram. When available, use
>>> this one instead of reading from io memory since it causes mtd/ubi to fail.
>>
>> This doesn't explain anything. Why do we need that? If anything we
>> should rather get rid of that NVRAM firmware driver. It was needed
>> before we had all NVMEM stuff in place. Finally how can reading
>> iomem break mtd/ubi?!
> 
> Did you take a look at the bootlog on this post on the thread, I've mentioned your user handle a few times but received no response on the forum.
> 
> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/asus-rt-ac88u-hw-a6-broken-in-22-03-3/147882/6?u=arinc9

Well, it doesn't really matter *in context* of getting this patch
accepted for mainline. It needs to be properly described on its own so
people can review it without looking through dozens of forum posts.

Sorry for not following that closely, I lagged behind due to my work on
other Broadcom topics. Broken LZMA, broken Linksys device support,
broken BCM5358. I'll see if I can figure out sth from that thread.