Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCBDC05027 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 11:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231214AbjBHL5a (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2023 06:57:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46330 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231200AbjBHL50 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2023 06:57:26 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CED54902E for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 03:57:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FBE2B81D6C for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 11:57:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A553C433A0; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 11:57:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1675857439; bh=BVw1vZicbo8JZjKsL73PiviDBYA38VzaxFGG0j4KLWs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=2W8MSLCjoLJOPmibeArKXJrIqneucO+kWp3WegNMESPXveLxYaERp82Q07D0+VFHM blMM10Ll5rVzjV0LTTtAFoXP+xh7AH4O6pVoYjythvGvZ5iIR6UuV/RW9Yf4kztIPf q1I8JhzllhsgRogDaXFKSICa7v94y1IItczVKG74= Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 12:57:17 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Visweswara Tanuku Cc: konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_vnivarth@quicinc.com, nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, vinod.koul@linaro.org, quic_eberman@quicinc.com, quic_satyap@quicinc.com Subject: Re: [RESEND] soc: qcom-geni-se: Update Tx and Rx fifo depth based on QUP HW version Message-ID: References: <20230206122215.22090-1-quic_vtanuku@quicinc.com> <0afc0752-1a4e-be3a-e9bd-0f56243d5e41@quicinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0afc0752-1a4e-be3a-e9bd-0f56243d5e41@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 04:54:13PM +0530, Visweswara Tanuku wrote: > > On 2/6/2023 11:39 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > A:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post > > Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > A: Top-posting. > > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > > > A: No. > > Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? > > Apologies will take care. > > > http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top > > > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:36:49PM +0530, Visweswara Tanuku wrote: > > > Added RESEND for resubmission of first version which is not modified in any > > > way from the previous submission. > > > > Then why was it resent? What will cause this to be accepted when the > > previous submission was not? > > > > confused, > > > > greg k-h > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/11/21/549 > > I had posted the same patch in November last year but did not receive any > response in spite of periodic reminders. > > Suspecting that the patch did not reach all the required recipients > re-posted the same and hence RESEND. When you resend, you need to say _why_ it was resent. "adding more people" is a valid reason, don't make us guess. Remember, some of us get hundreds of patches a day/week to review, we have no saved context. thanks, greg k-h