Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:19:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:19:24 -0500 Received: from chunnel.redhat.com ([199.183.24.220]:14576 "EHLO sisko.scot.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:18:33 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 18:18:09 +0000 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: Zlatko Calusic Cc: Andrew Morton , sct@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext3 writeback mode slower than ordered mode? Message-ID: <20011210181809.J1919@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <871yi5wh93.fsf@atlas.iskon.hr> <3C12C57C.FF93FAC0@zip.com.au> <877krwch39.fsf@atlas.iskon.hr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <877krwch39.fsf@atlas.iskon.hr>; from zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr on Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:46:02PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:46:02PM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > To sumarize: > > ext2 0.01s user 1.86s system 98% cpu 1.893 total > ext3/ordered 0.07s user 3.50s system 99% cpu 3.594 total > ext3/writeback 0.00s user 6.05s system 98% cpu 6.129 total > > What is strange is that not always I've been able to get different > results for writeback case (comparing to ordered), but when I get it, > it is repeatable. So it could be something as basic as disk layout or allocation pattern. Hmm. Could you profile the kernel and see where writeback is spending all the time, in that case? Thanks, Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/