Date:   Wed, 8 Feb 2023 18:28:15 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To:     Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] Add basic ACPI support for RISC-V
Message-ID: <Y+Ppv6kB1iksf+TF@spud>
References: <20230130182225.2471414-1-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3UvAYbWp1U8XT/He"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230130182225.2471414-1-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Precedence: bulk


--3UvAYbWp1U8XT/He
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey Sunil,

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:52:01PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> This patch series enables the basic ACPI infrastructure for RISC-V.
> Supporting external interrupt controllers is in progress and hence it is
> tested using polling based HVC SBI console and RAM disk.
>=20
> The series depends on Anup's IPI improvement series.
> https://github.com/avpatel/linux/commits/riscv_ipi_imp_v17

In the future, please provide links to patchsets rather than "random"
git trees.

> Jisheng Zhang (1):
>   riscv: move sbi_init() earlier before jump_label_init()
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What has this patch got to do with your series? Just something that was
sitting in your tree?

If you need this, it'd be ideal if you would submit *with* the R-b tags
it appears to have had by v6 [1] & add the reason that you need to move
it to the commit message.
In Jisheng's series that was obvious, but this is a significantly larger
series and it is hard to spot your reasoning for it.

Cheers,
Conor.


--3UvAYbWp1U8XT/He
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCY+PpvwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0vPuAP9v5J77SYw+hhwGsTWGrB7BFSWQB+FJSClGtSF9oLyAyQD/eikMzjv2mCEL
dIFF92vSrmUAKvml2Nv8u8CbSJh1RwM=
=oI2R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3UvAYbWp1U8XT/He--