Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756642AbXICUUH (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2007 16:20:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754542AbXICUT4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2007 16:19:56 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]:40544 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753891AbXICUTz (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2007 16:19:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rVt18+Pj2wBSMFaqoC8IrKkqi2Pm2c38moDm4mARMayOneoCPiPrUaPWIU3RUA+4fFkTWUQuM7cSJ6oQMDy+jq59IqWemZYWkFhDc7v0DG5PyMUFdb79fAFL+GXkMx4UPWqW2ox5sTWcajm8vPUnz2Ox2HhKpTqcq5QAuU6MYac= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:19:54 -0500 From: "Eric Van Hensbergen" To: "Rusty Russell" Subject: Re: [Lguest] [RFC] 9p Virtualization Transports Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, lguest@ozlabs.org In-Reply-To: <1188681297.10802.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <11883271601857-git-send-email-ericvh@gmail.com> <1188681297.10802.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1461 Lines: 29 On 9/1/07, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 13:52 -0500, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote: > > The lguest and kvm transports are functional, but we are still working out > > remaining bugs and need to spend some time focusing on performance issues. > > I wanted to send out this "preview" patch set to the community to solicit > > ideas on things we can do differently/better. > > Patches look reasonable, but just a heads-up: lguest will be moving to > virtio, as will kvm. That means a single implementation for both > (yay!), but it does complicate your life in the short term 8( > > Dor has published a kvm virtio implementation, and we've already > discussed a couple of modifications. I expect that to be nailed in the > next 2 weeks tho, and lguest will follow. > yeah, I've been emailing Dor -- it sounds like he'll have stuff ready for the 2.6.24 merge window -- that being the case, I'll write a virtio transport and mothball the PCI and lguest transports. They were straightforward to write (a couple hours for the lguest transport) and the lguest transport was a good learning experience -- so I'm not shedding tears over wasted effort. -eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/