Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2023 00:03:09 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     =?utf-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgTMOpZ2Vy?= <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
        Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
        =?utf-8?Q?Miqu=C3=A8l?= Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
        Milan Stevanovic <milan.stevanovic@se.com>,
        Jimmy Lalande <jimmy.lalande@se.com>,
        Pascal Eberhard <pascal.eberhard@se.com>,
        Arun Ramadoss <Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com>,
        linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: dsa: rzn1-a5psw: add vlan support
Message-ID: <20230208220309.4ekk4xpmpx27rkt6@skbuf>
References: <20230208161749.331965-1-clement.leger@bootlin.com>
 <20230208161749.331965-1-clement.leger@bootlin.com>
 <20230208161749.331965-4-clement.leger@bootlin.com>
 <20230208161749.331965-4-clement.leger@bootlin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20230208161749.331965-4-clement.leger@bootlin.com>
 <20230208161749.331965-4-clement.leger@bootlin.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 05:17:49PM +0100, Cl?ment L?ger wrote:
> +static void a5psw_port_vlan_tagged_cfg(struct a5psw *a5psw, int vlan_res_id,
> +				       int port, bool set)
> +{
> +	u32 mask = A5PSW_VLAN_RES_WR_PORTMASK | A5PSW_VLAN_RES_RD_TAGMASK |
> +		   BIT(port);
> +	u32 vlan_res_off = A5PSW_VLAN_RES(vlan_res_id);
> +	u32 val = A5PSW_VLAN_RES_WR_TAGMASK, reg;
> +
> +	if (set)
> +		val |= BIT(port);
> +
> +	/* Toggle tag mask read */
> +	a5psw_reg_writel(a5psw, vlan_res_off, A5PSW_VLAN_RES_RD_TAGMASK);
> +	reg = a5psw_reg_readl(a5psw, vlan_res_off);
> +	a5psw_reg_writel(a5psw, vlan_res_off, A5PSW_VLAN_RES_RD_TAGMASK);

Is it intentional that this register is written twice?

> +
> +	reg &= ~mask;
> +	reg |= val;
> +	a5psw_reg_writel(a5psw, vlan_res_off, reg);
> +}