Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B3AC05027 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 09:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229854AbjBIJEW (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2023 04:04:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40504 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229476AbjBIJEU (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2023 04:04:20 -0500 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.153.233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9291BEC4B for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 01:04:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1675933458; x=1707469458; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=B22J8C980OM1Kvqfd4PEL6BBxLh6LNsp47XsaCW9fb4=; b=hIRQJJGDUfw9/NreacGx+h/dayyQKhxiGt29GqjlcrANcFKDAwWSpDJ/ uGqIt93/tY9inztrr/lGlofKPi56pK0AWzVl0tS+2odg3fNN7uLYsP4L3 cBkIM7n4oa0I/nVp81pvs0X5IaxcP4Qso8mIu3Ps1g5gt3CWyGr1pg6RR eYkcM4EK0soBbfTvnl7nilwv/iwVNNjARnxcj2hQ6JvkKGTMsbq4ckfdR Oixka0MDKhLDda/GOVJFXze/ix1/43/84O4QAWF7WmdW2SBbr7o7NxFdW qoPs1+VjmyQ684NhsIvTnbaXJbLLGC+SH/5bzKHgBHzSlbGhMEcdkKdhm g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,283,1669100400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="211236035" Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa1.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 09 Feb 2023 02:04:17 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.16; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 02:04:17 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.16 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 02:04:15 -0700 Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 09:03:50 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Andrew Jones CC: Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , , , , , Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: fix ordering of Zbb extension Message-ID: References: <20230208225328.1636017-1-heiko@sntech.de> <20230208225328.1636017-2-heiko@sntech.de> <20230209082520.solukez3jrshv3qo@orel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hNr57WA66Fc7v39A" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230209082520.solukez3jrshv3qo@orel> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --hNr57WA66Fc7v39A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 09:25:20AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 11:20:10PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > Hey Heiko, > >=20 > > On 8 February 2023 22:53:27 GMT, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > >From: Heiko Stuebner > > > > > >As Andrew reported, > > > Zb* comes after Zi* according 27.11 "Subset Naming Convention" > > >so fix the ordering accordingly. > > > > > >Reported-by: Andrew Jones > > >Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner > >=20 > > The whole "getting it wrong immediately after fixing it up" ;) >=20 > Hi Conor, >=20 > Do you know any patchwork savvy people that could whip up a check > for this array? :-) Maybe that is more of a checkpatch type thing? Either way, I'll put it on the todo list I suppose! --hNr57WA66Fc7v39A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCY+S29gAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0g7fAP9oVUIeufGJdmfpCNWTvatLD+qZqM6xhguUpuIizocYtQEAlN4fj4zu3jTO ex8o2+z+i3+9g/A71DmaXbiPPOIrGQA= =581v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hNr57WA66Fc7v39A--