Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CFDC636D7 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 12:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229780AbjBIM6a (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2023 07:58:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60224 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229483AbjBIM62 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2023 07:58:28 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BAD783EF; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 04:58:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1A7661A3E; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 12:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DB78C433D2; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 12:58:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1675947506; bh=BIA4FTURFrvXnkpdcGAJC7eUwFXh6Wbr3akTf63NIN4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Mj51+W26Br+nLAcmj0/2vWD6X1CbipF/tiA1ILLUlQQv33y79C+n4+SP18W3KfYKA Cy1Y+K7ws0DNmhpvvZqmeLPmr7FbL1FiJXd2F413m/wa4p46o32VN6v16v5fkQ08Se kgSVcfUvrLyrDc4y4GBGC8Uw6kOWV1vJPHk4Zg2S2dN+SmcAbDog8jsvMD1QPOHlkN EP9H/65qTO53siq9Z77Zapf/RFRNZhQ+vl9iFFTv4M6jG0B3ykPDbGTpHrR1//zC3u ZSoUhb8Z6TlJVNZefk/Sq6O3adLTr7J8MO0Of8cij/pbDOB98DyRfYKZ93KEIBfK5p PDIMpiNMM5JMg== Message-ID: <9cc8df06-8ad3-234d-b221-b1af2ee3719a@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 14:58:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add ICSSG ethernet driver Content-Language: en-US To: Md Danish Anwar , Andrew Lunn Cc: MD Danish Anwar , "Andrew F. Davis" , Suman Anna , YueHaibing , Vignesh Raghavendra , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Paolo Abeni , Jakub Kicinski , Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , nm@ti.com, ssantosh@kernel.org, srk@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20230206060708.3574472-1-danishanwar@ti.com> <20230206060708.3574472-3-danishanwar@ti.com> <42503a0d-b434-bbcc-553d-a326af5b4918@ti.com> <4438fb71-7e20-6532-a858-b688bc64e826@ti.com> <6713252d-6f86-c674-9229-c4512ebf1d72@ti.com> From: Roger Quadros In-Reply-To: <6713252d-6f86-c674-9229-c4512ebf1d72@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/02/2023 12:29, Md Danish Anwar wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 08/02/23 18:26, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>>>>>> +static int prueth_config_rgmiidelay(struct prueth *prueth, >>>>>>> + struct device_node *eth_np, >>>>>>> + phy_interface_t phy_if) >>>>>>> +{ >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>>> + if (phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID || >>>>>>> + phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID) >>>>>>> + rgmii_tx_id |= ICSSG_CTRL_RGMII_ID_MODE; >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + regmap_update_bits(ctrl_mmr, icssgctrl_reg, ICSSG_CTRL_RGMII_ID_MODE, rgmii_tx_id); >>>> >>>> This is only applicable to some devices so you need to restrict this only >>>> to those devices. >>>> >>> >>> Currently ICSSG driver is getting upstreamed for AM65 SR2.0 device, so I don't >>> think there is any need for any device related restriction. Once support for >>> other devices are enabled for upstream, we can modify this accordingly. >> >> The problem is, this is a board property, not a SoC property. What if >> somebody designs a board with extra long clock lines in order to add >> the delay? >> >>> I checked the latest Technical Reference Manual [1] (Section 5.1.3.4.49, Table >>> 5-624) for AM65 Silicon Revision 2.0. >>> >>> Below is the description in Table 5-624 >>> >>> BIT : 24 >>> Field : RGMII0_ID_MODE >>> Type : R/W >>> Reset : 0h >>> Description : Controls the PRU_ICSSG0 RGMII0 port internal transmit delay >>> 0h - Internal transmit delay is enabled >>> 1h - Reserved >>> >>> The TX internal delay is always enabled and couldn't be disabled as 1h is >>> reserved. So hardware support for disabling TX internal delay is not there. >> >> So if somebody passes a phy-mode which requires it disabled, you need >> to return -EINVAL, to indicate the hardware cannot actually do it. >> > > Sure, I'll do that. In the list of all phy modes described in [1], I can only > see phy-mode "rgmii-txid", for which we can return -EINVAL. Is there any other > phy-mode that requires enabling/disabling TX internal delays? Please let me > know if any other phy-mode also needs this. I will add check for that as well. > >>> As, TX internal delay is always there, there is no need to enable it in MAC or >>> PHY. So no need of API prueth_config_rgmiidelay(). >>> >>> My approach to handle delay would be as below. >>> >>> *) Keep phy-mode = "rgmii-id" in DT as asked by Andrew. >> >> As i said this depends on the board, not the SoC. In theory, you could >> design a board with an extra long RX clock line, and then use phy-mode >> rgmii-txid, meaning the MAC/PHY combination needs to add the TX delay. >> > > Yes I understand that board can have any phy-mode in it's DTS. We need to be > able to handle all different phy modes. > >>> *) Let TX internal delay enabled in Hardware. >>> *) Let PHY configure RX internal delay. >>> *) Remove prueth_config_rgmiidelay() API is there is no use of this. TX >>> Internal delay is always enabled. >>> *) Instead of calling prueth_config_rgmiidelay() API in prueth_netdev_init() >>> API, add below if condition. >>> >>> if(emac->phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID) >>> emac->phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID >> >> You should handle all cases where a TX delay is requested, not just >> ID. >> > > So there could be four different RGMII phy modes as described in [1]. Below is > the handling mechanism for different phy modes. > > 1) # RGMII with internal RX and TX delays provided by the PHY, > # the MAC should not add the RX or TX delays in this case > - rgmii-id > > For phy-mode="rgmii-id", phy needs to add both TX and RX internal delays. But > in our SoC TX internal delay is always enabled. So to handle this, we'll change OK. I thought that this MAC forced TX delay issue was fixed in Later Silicon Revisions. But it looks like it hasn't been fixed yet. > the phy-mode in driver to "rgmii-rxid" and then pass it ti PHY, so that PHY > will enable RX internal delay only. OK. > > 2) # RGMII with internal RX delay provided by the PHY, the MAC > # should not add an RX delay in this case > - rgmii-rxid > > For phy-mode="rgmii-rxid", phy needs to add only RX internal delay. We will do > nothing in the driver and just pass the same mode to phy, so that PHY will > enable RX internal delay only. But the MAC is forcing TX-delay right? So this case can't be implemented. you have to return error. > > 3) # RGMII with internal TX delay provided by the PHY, the MAC > # should not add an TX delay in this case > - rgmii-txid > > For phy-mode="rgmii-txid", phy needs to add only TX internal delay,the MAC > should not add an TX delay in this case. But in our SoC TX internal delay is > always enabled. So this scenario can not be handled. We will return -EINVAL in > this case. As you didn't return error for 1st case "rgmii-id" even though TX delay was requested for PHY but you added it in the MAC I see no reason to return error here. You just do the delay in MAC and pass "rgmii" to the PHY. > > > 4) # RX and TX delays are added by the MAC when required > - rgmii > > For phy-mode="rgmii", MAC needs to add both TX and RX delays. But in our SoC TX > internal delay is always enabled so no need to add TX delay. For RX I am not > sure what should we do as there is no provision of adding RX delay in MAC > currently. Should we ask PHY to add RX delay? > I don't think it will work so you can error out in this case. > Andrew, Roger, Can you please comment on this. > > Apart from Case 4, below code change will be able to handle all other cases. > > if(emac->phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID) > emac->phy_if = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID; > if(emac->phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID) > return -EINVAL; > > Please let me know if I am missing any other phy modes. > > [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-controller.yaml > >> Andrew > cheers, -roger