To: davids@webmaster.com
Cc: dhazelton@enter.net, espie@nerim.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL weasels and the atheros stink
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:23:37 PDT."
             <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKOEGFGJAC.davids@webmaster.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
References: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKOEGFGJAC.davids@webmaster.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1188918652_2860P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 11:10:52 -0400
Message-ID: <31129.1188918652@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1211
Lines: 35

--==_Exmh_1188918652_2860P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:23:37 PDT, David Schwartz said:
> 
> > Wrong - I said "You can't complain about Person A doing X when
> > you let Person
> > B do X without complaint".
> 
> Yes, I can. There is no inconsistency between acting in one case and failing
> to act in another. We need not act in every possible case where we could act
> to preserve our right to act in a particular case.

You *do* however need to be aware that in some cases, public inactivity and/or
statements that something will not be acted on may estoppel any future attempts
to enforce something.

--==_Exmh_1188918652_2860P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFG3XV8cC3lWbTT17ARAlGEAJ0UiGzlbVs7Nosb01JSiR1yR+RFFQCgoRb3
AeaSJidNJlsMpgWbS32/oZ8=
=MUeT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1188918652_2860P--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/