Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E15C61DA4 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229969AbjBJASy (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2023 19:18:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46872 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229606AbjBJASv (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2023 19:18:51 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76F375EBE1; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 16:18:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C1E3B8237C; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F8D3C433EF; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:18:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1675988326; bh=swlVp1NnJftmoY6ijYOEUVS1jlagKsrzASBERDaImfQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=dBF6UhksqgpWe5umxdWjAjwioM1a/zldCDqaLuwcVDKIGhqOVuQB8aZ8Q17nFax7d ZdMTt4P1CiWee8pBFbp4CKwXkezYE18SKoFrrnkQrk/XvwcAfIf6dZEu30QX5F4x8R R+wa4r3u/CQ/Y6AWy+XnG+nrLtWe8y21bJjUPjK241TxNPyzgll1ECSERuk/ZWL3fF PLxQudhJCaGFWDbjXWVJlMCkwsnLoZ1OwsYHYn/H5bXGkvzLedqk4uGVh/IiwCavGb tWvGFslRJ/TYVORMj56j+/SbQyVZg/Onk3oeR0cuu6Xl6noYTrv6oMlA7qxl7P0+wK uOITQADl+ZK1g== Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 18:18:45 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Vidya Sagar Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, kai.heng.feng@canonical.com, enriquezmark36@gmail.com, tasev.stefanoska@skynet.be, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, treding@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, kthota@nvidia.com, mmaddireddy@nvidia.com, sagar.tv@gmail.com, Thomas Witt Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] PCI/ASPM: Skip L1SS save/restore if not already enabled Message-ID: <20230210001845.GA2630328@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230208234229.GA2496794@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [+cc Thomas] On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 05:42:29PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 02:45:40PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote: > > Skip save and restore of ASPM L1 Sub-States specific registers if they > > are not already enabled in the system. This is to avoid issues observed > > on certain platforms during restoration process, particularly when > > restoring the L1SS registers contents. > > > > BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216782 > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar > > --- > > v2: > > * Address review comments from Kai-Heng Feng and Rafael > > > > drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > > include/linux/pci.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > > index 53a1fa306e1e..bd2a922081bd 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > > @@ -761,11 +761,23 @@ void pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *dev) > > { > > struct pci_cap_saved_state *save_state; > > u16 l1ss = dev->l1ss; > > - u32 *cap; > > + u32 *cap, val; > > > > if (!l1ss) > > return; > > > > + /* > > + * Skip save and restore of L1 Sub-States registers if they are not > > + * already enabled in the system > > + */ > > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, l1ss + PCI_L1SS_CTL1, &val); > > + if (!(val & PCI_L1SS_CTL1_L1SS_MASK)) { > > + dev->skip_l1ss_restore = true; > > + return; > > + } > > I think this fix is still problematic. PCIe r6.0, sec 5.5.4, requires > that > > If setting either or both of the enable bits for ASPM L1 PM > Substates, both ports must be configured as described in this > section while ASPM L1 is disabled. > > The current Linux code does not observe this because ASPM L1 is > enabled by PCI_EXP_LNKCTL (in the PCIe Capability Link Control > register), while ASPM L1 PM Substate configuration is in PCI_L1SS_CTL1 > (in the L1 PM Substates Capability), and these two things are not > integrated: > > pci_restore_state > pci_restore_aspm_l1ss_state > aspm_program_l1ss > pci_write_config_dword(PCI_L1SS_CTL1, ctl1) # L1SS restore > pci_restore_pcie_state > pcie_capability_write_word(PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, cap[i++]) # L1 restore > > So I suspect the problem is that we're writing PCI_L1SS_CTL1 while > ASPM L1 is enabled, and the device gets confused somehow. > > I think it would be better change this restore flow to follow that > spec requirement instead of skipping the save/restore like this. A revert of 4ff116d0d5fd ("PCI/ASPM: Save L1 PM Substates Capability for suspend/resume") has been in linux-next starting with Feb 6. I originally reverted 5e85eba6f50d ("PCI/ASPM: Refactor L1 PM Substates Control Register programming") because it broke suspend/resume differently [1]. I had to revert 4ff116d0d5fd at the same time because 5e85eba6f50d added aspm_program_l1ss(), which was used by 4ff116d0d5fd. I don't think Tasev or Mark have directly tested reverting 4ff116d0d5fd to see if it resolves the problem *they* are seeing. But that would be good to know so I can update the commit logs. Bjorn [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216877